Because maybe people are tired of seeing a team without a legitimate chance of winning. How the mighty have fallen when "making the playoffs" is the standard (and they can't even do that consistently). Not a top 10 scorer since 1985/86 for the most successful franchise in NHL history and 2nd most successful franchise in North American sports history is a disgrace. I guess being knee deep in mediocrity is o.k. for some. Now watch the Blackhawks successfully complete their 2nd tank job since the last one got them 3 cups while Montreal with a dearth of elite young talent pushes themselves from a potential game changing top 3 pick to a barely top 10 pick if lucky. This draft doesn't have 10 franchise players. They have Bedard, Fantilli/Carlson, Michkov and then some very good pieces.
I'll give you St. Louis a few years ago, but who else? Inquiring minds want to know.
LA and Boston had very good players, but none in the Crosby, Overchkin, Kane megastar level. Even Mackinnon is not at that level. In fact, LA and Boston and Saint Louis won 4 cups without a top-10 scorer, all in the last 11 years.
So it happens sometimes that a team wins without a top-10 league-wide star.
On the other hand, there have been ZERO cases of a team winning the Cup without a strong 10-11 guys though.
So best course of action in my view is to build the core roster of 10-11 strong guys and if one of them, or a lucky arrival, is a megastar one year or even several years, it's icing on the cake.
Leo Carlsson instead of Will Smith or another top-10 pick is not going to be more impactful than having 5 good players, so be happy if Guhle, Matheson and Dach are supplementing Suzuki and Caufield now and getting us closer to that strong perrenially contending core.