This is absolutely absurd. You wouldn't take him for free?!?! He was a super star all year long. Did you watch one game? It reads like you haven't watched anything but the last two games. Literally all the professionals that cover that team and his teammates do nothing but talk about how incredible of a leader and player he is. He was up for the selke trophy this year. Scored over a ppg. It wasn't a narrative about him being top 5 to 10 winger its because he is good. He was a young player developing thats how it works. He carries linemates to career years on multiple teams. His possession numbers are off the charts. He drives a line like a center.
Then to double down and say you like the return?!?! The return is absolutely putrid. Brannstrom couldn't play in a series like that.
Your emotional attachment to Stone is becoming an unhealthy one...
So much wrong with this post but to answer your question - No, I would not want Stone at 10m for the next 6 seasons. Nothing absurd about it my guy, just frugal cap management.
Next - Yes I watched Stone all playoffs long. Did you? Everyone including Mark Stone is being hyper critical of his performance because it was putrid. It sort of feels like
you were the one to watch him play just one or two games, and then assumed that he was the regular season version of himself in the other rounds this year.
Spoiler Alert - he was not.
He had a 4 game pointless streak in between round one/two (two of them were in elimination games).
Then he had a 7 game pointless streak between rounds two/three - again two of those seven games were elimination games for his team.
And not only was he not contributing offensively at all, but by the end of the Montreal series he was literally hurting his team on the ice with indifferent plays and by being totally ineffective with the minutes he was given. He was the furthest thing from this line driving multiplier that you are describing, and wasn't playing what anyone would call a solid two-way game.
And his body language on the ice and bench (visibly frustrated/rattled/sulky), as the captain and leader, was no help at all to his very frustrated and floundering team with no confidence... Adverse situations are where the true great leaders shine, just saying... Mark Stone wears his his heart on his sleeve - which is great and his positivity is infectious when times are good - but its seemingly problematic when times are not so good, and hes the one thats expected to calm his team down and guide them through tricky waters.
Mark Stone is 29 years old now, and this myth that hes been this young budding star for the last 4 years is a fallacy. He was a 60pt player at age 22, and he did not just recently figure it all out...That was his prime, and we probably gave up 2 solid years of it in reality. And hes now very likely on his way out of it....
And Brannstrom is
still only 21yrs old, 8 full years younger than Stone, what kind of nonsensical point are you trying to make about him playing in the ECF this year and struggling? On what team? And are we talking like Mark Stone struggling? Worse???