Mete showed on a couple of occasions last night that he's speedy enough to skate into the opposition zone as no other Habs D can and create a scoring chance. That was one upside.
I'm willing to overlook some of the messier plays in his own zone, as he has barely played this season.
Didn't see much of JD last night, seems he didn't get a ton of ice time, or perhaps I'm imagining it. I wonder if he's not nursing some minor injury. He didn't look as quick as usual out there but then again that could be said of everybody.
Excume me but that's not my excuses. I write excuses because I want to enlight that bs Bergevin said years ago. The excuses came back often. Everybody have excuses, posters have excuses to explain anything without mentioning the word. Let's not be hypocrits about the word "excuses" when it applies.guess you have your excuses ready.
I gotta find another team to cheer for...not sure how much longer I can take these plugs.
no mention of scorey perry ?
and C+ for Drouin, is this graded on a curve ?
I know that but seeing that the Friday was open there was absolutely no reason not to level the playing field for both clubs. Particularly since we haven't had 1 game suspended in the North. I get that the computers generate most of this stuff but there should also be some oversight to vet the schedule and make sure there are no anomalies like the one we just had.
It's not an anomaly. The league would balance those out and if one team gets them, they all do.
A Beaker post? Wow. It does feel like 2008 again. Haven't seen you on here much lately. Welcome back.I’d like to thank Anderson for targeting Lucic all night. It made me feel like it was 2008 again.
He's this year's KovalchukPerry has been a huge bargain for what he is bringing
You should watch more games.I didn't bother with the 4th line. They weren't great. Perry was good but really just on the PP.
Drouin wasn't great (hence a C+) but he wasn't Suzuki/Anderson bad. Saw him back checking a few times. It just seemed like he had the only legs on that line.
He's this year's Kovalchuk
Sure. Except our top line centers would be just hitting puberty.Kovalchuk, Perry, Weber , and Price...
If this was 10 years ago the Habs would have the best core in the league....
Sure. Except our top line centers would be just hitting puberty.
not evenSure. Except our top line centers would be just hitting puberty.
You should watch more games.
Perry was excellent outside of the goal riding the hard ice all night.
Drouin was, again, a ghost. At least when he is not scoring Anderson will toss the mitts and if the argument is that drouin was better than our young center in a sophomore slump let's not pull any punches;
Jonathan drouin is a waste of space in both ends of the ice ( his hits that no one fears, notwithstanding).
He is our Skinner.
It ain't good.
That opens up the question as to whether or not Getzlaf would've been successful here. In Anaheim he had Perry. Does he become the player he became in Montreal? Who knows? We had terrible development for years so there's a good chance he never becomes the star he did.Yeah i guess they still would of needed a franchise center to be considered the best core...Kovalchuk if i remember correctly could play center out of necessity but not his natural position....
Drafting Getzlaf instead of Kostitsyn could of went a long way in terms of solving that issue too.
That opens up the question as to whether or not Getzlaf would've been successful here. In Anaheim he had Perry. Does he become the player he became in Montreal? Who knows? We had terrible development for years so there's a good chance he never becomes the star he did.
Same thing whenever I hear somebody talk about Kopitar. Who the hell knows if that guy ever does anything if we'd drafted him. We might've just limited his minutes and played him on the wing like we did with Galchenyuk. Montreal has been a very conservatively coached team for decades now. We "coach" the creativity right out of our players.
You should watch more games.
Perry was excellent outside of the goal riding the hard ice all night.
Drouin was, again, a ghost. At least when he is not scoring Anderson will toss the mitts and if the argument is that drouin was better than our young center in a sophomore slump let's not pull any punches;
Jonathan drouin is a waste of space in both ends of the ice ( his hits that no one fears, notwithstanding).
He is our Skinner.
It ain't good.
message not clear.Excume me but that's not my excuses. I write excuses because I want to enlight that bs Bergevin said years ago. The excuses came back often. Everybody have excuses, posters have excuses to explain anything without mentioning the word. Let's not be hypocrits about the word "excuses" when it applies.
I missed the first period. But one of the very few chances we created 5 v 5 was when Drouin was replaced with Toffoli he worked a give and go with Suzuki and moved the puck to a prime scoring position between the hash marks in the slot. Unfortunately he missed the corner he was gunning for and it was available. That line suddenly gained energy when Drouin was moved. I didn't think Suzuki played terrible at all after that or at least not any worse than anyone else in our forward group. Also it was his line that generated our only goal when Drouin wasn't there. So yeah I guess Drouin had a good game.I watch em all. I've criticized Drouin plenty.
(mod) People can disagree.
I thought Drouin had a better night than Suzuki.
I'm looking forward to seeing us when well rested.
You should watch more games.
Perry was excellent outside of the goal riding the hard ice all night.
Drouin was, again, a ghost. At least when he is not scoring Anderson will toss the mitts and if the argument is that drouin was better than our young center in a sophomore slump let's not pull any punches;
Jonathan drouin is a waste of space in both ends of the ice ( his hits that no one fears, notwithstanding).
He is our Skinner.
It ain't good.
Watched the highlights on NHL website, fell asleep.