OK, here goes.
In the mix for the last two will be: Phillips, maybe Stevens as an OA, perhaps the second import pick, Gallant (?), Brown (?), Jared Nash (?), and perhaps another player from this coming draft.
What does Stevens bring to the team that would make him worthy of an overage slot? His hands of stone? His constant slashing penalties? He doesn't bring anything to this team that we couldn't get from a younger better player.
Phillips brings toughness so he's worth holding on to.
Did Marc steal your lunch money or something? lol
Seriously though, I know what you are saying....team needs veterans though, and Marc fits that bill. I would prefer an upgrade obviously, but I think him and CJ are the only OA candidates, so I don't see them being outright released or anything. Maybe Stevens goes the way of many other OHL players who are victims of the numbers game - the Caledonia Corvairs? I dunno....I did say maybe, after all.
I like Phillips too, but I don't know if he's better suited as a F or a D....I know I like him better on the wing, and in terms of roster composition he fits better there, but I don't know what he or the team thinks. I don't have an issue keeping him, but with some combo of Smith, Rhodes and even Bricknell, I don't think this team needs a whole lot more toughness. There's no room for the designated policeman anymore, so if Phillips sticks, he'll have to contribute in other ways as well.
I'm very interested to see how it all shakes out...if nothing else, it might make camp pretty competitive in August/September.
Did Marc steal your lunch money or something? lol
Seriously though, I know what you are saying....team needs veterans though, and Marc fits that bill. I would prefer an upgrade obviously, but I think him and CJ are the only OA candidates, so I don't see them being outright released or anything. Maybe Stevens goes the way of many other OHL players who are victims of the numbers game - the Caledonia Corvairs? I dunno....I did say maybe, after all.
I like Phillips too, but I don't know if he's better suited as a F or a D....I know I like him better on the wing, and in terms of roster composition he fits better there, but I don't know what he or the team thinks. I don't have an issue keeping him, but with some combo of Smith, Rhodes and even Bricknell, I don't think this team needs a whole lot more toughness. There's no room for the designated policeman anymore, so if Phillips sticks, he'll have to contribute in other ways as well.
I'm very interested to see how it all shakes out...if nothing else, it might make camp pretty competitive in August/September.
The GOJHL is going to make changes regarding 20 years old players .So he might not be able to play there There was a article about it on Our Sports Nation I think.Did Marc steal your lunch money or something? lol
Seriously though, I know what you are saying....team needs veterans though, and Marc fits that bill. I would prefer an upgrade obviously, but I think him and CJ are the only OA candidates, so I don't see them being outright released or anything. Maybe Stevens goes the way of many other OHL players who are victims of the numbers game - the Caledonia Corvairs? I dunno....I did say maybe, after all.
I like Phillips too, but I don't know if he's better suited as a F or a D....I know I like him better on the wing, and in terms of roster composition he fits better there, but I don't know what he or the team thinks. I don't have an issue keeping him, but with some combo of Smith, Rhodes and even Bricknell, I don't think this team needs a whole lot more toughness. There's no room for the designated policeman anymore, so if Phillips sticks, he'll have to contribute in other ways as well.
I'm very interested to see how it all shakes out...if nothing else, it might make camp pretty competitive in August/September.
Watcher: How about for the tie breaker some kind of playoff prediction or draft prediction to keep things interesting?
Sure, how about first round Western Conference playoff predictions... series winners and number of games - The # of games it takes is the tie-breaker (i.e. closest to correct win/loss if we have the same teams.) We'll have to post before tomorrow night's games if we're a go.
The GOJHL is going to make changes regarding 20 years old players .So he might not be able to play there There was a article about it on Our Sports Nation I think.
So - a pretty reliable poster in the OHL Draft thread has word that both Jenkins and Wilde have committed to the USNTDP.
Kinda sucky, but can't say I am surprised....I'd be shocked if one or both don't end up in London at some point, but I digress.
So, what are the Storm to do? Take one of them anyway? Take Merkley? Take another player, likely a F/C?
What does everyone think.
Personally, I'd love a F/C, but I think you have to just go BPA and that seems to be Merkely if you take out the Americans.
Part of me wants to take an American anyway, but that might backfire.
Saw Saxon tweeted this as well. Very good question.
My thoughts...with the first overall pick I don't gamble. If Wilde or Jenkins are sketchy on commitment then I take BPA, which is Merkley. This would present to me an interesting situation where having Merkley then makes McFadden a piece to move as they are both OFD and McFadden might fetch the forward the team can use.
The gamble on taking a player that you'd have to declare defective is that you won't get the first overall pick again. I suppose you could fetch a ransom in other picks, but the Storm have 5-6 picks in the first three rounds of the next four or five drafts. Then you turn into Peterborough 2.0. The team needs to make this pick count and continue the build for two seasons from now.
I take Wilde or Jenkins if I'm drafting 4th or after though...at that point the impact players available start to diminish and having the windfall of extra picks and the extra first rounder next year makes sense. Just my nickels worth.
I agree- 100% would not take a small offensive defenseman with the #1 pick.
However, if i KNEW he wasnt going to commit, i would gamble on the Defective option and hope to turn the defective (non-reporting) small defense man into a bundle of high rounds picks. This does makes sense to me as there is not a consensus "STUD" forward available to draft this year at #1 overall.
People keep bringing up this option of trading a defective player for a boat load of assets? That isn't going to work with Wilde or Jenkins. It really only works for a player that wants to play in the OHL, just not with the team that drafts him (Ie. McLeod, Brown).
No team is going to give up a bundle for a guy who is signing with the USNDP for the next two years.
I heard from a pretty reliable person, not with Guelph for that matter, that wilde needed a commit before last week or he was signing with usntp, so that leads me to believe Guelph was going in another direction with the pick. And if he was not going first, he was not going OHL right away... so my guess is it is going to be Merkley... just my guess based on what I had heard...
That is strange , because Larry said several times on his pregame show that he was told those players would report if drafted.
Kirill Nizhnikov is also top player....I heard from a pretty reliable person, not with Guelph for that matter, that wilde needed a commit before last week or he was signing with usntp, so that leads me to believe Guelph was going in another direction with the pick. And if he was not going first, he was not going OHL right away... so my guess is it is going to be Merkley... just my guess based on what I had heard...
Kirill Nizhnikov is also top player....