AuraSphere
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2012
- 4,231
- 2,318
Gardiner actually did good... did half of you even watch the game LOL
Gardiner was our best player.. His past performance are clouding their view
Winnik should be the 4th line center.
Send smith down.
Panik plays in komorovs spot till he is back.
Call up kozun, frattin or leivo
Yes, the Hawks have created new hockey fans since winning the cup in 2010, which is just an awful thing to see. But seriously, make sure you understand Chicago's ownership history before judging an (at the time) alienated fanbase.
If you think turning into the Oilers/Sabres for the next 5 years is even an option Shanahan would be given by his bosses, then you're living in fantasy land.
Cue another long losing streak? These road games are going to kill them. I have no faith
Just caught the very end. Why were the Hawks weepy? What happened?
Assistant equipment manager passed away at age 34. Left behind wife and 4 kids.
Google Clint Reif
Game
The Hawks played without much effort, without really ever being into the game. The two points was there for the taking, you pretty much don't get a better opportunity than this. It's just that the Leafs equaled their effort, and don't have the same base skill to rely on as the Hawks have.
EDIT: To give some more info on why the ratings are so low. The Hawks didn't play a good game, they were giving us the initiative and was sitting back, and didn't even really pounce on their chances with a lot of authority. There were lanes and opportunities there for the taking, and a team that went into this game with even average intensity for an NHL team would be getting results. Instead we barely held on to the initiative through the night, created very few chances and screwed up a lot on those basic things that we actually did well in the beginning of the season, such as covering each other and giving support on the breakout. They had an easy time creating rather good chances, and while they were effective in a a general sense, they had a disproportionate amount of good chances compared to actual shots.
Which probably means that I'm underselling Reimer a bit here.
Yes, the Hawks have created new hockey fans since winning the cup in 2010, which is just an awful thing to see. But seriously, make sure you understand Chicago's ownership history before judging an (at the time) alienated fanbase.
You know what, honestly the Leafs didn't play that bad this game.
That goal with 0.4 seconds left was a *****. I didn't watch the last 7-8 minutes of the game (because at that point the final score was ruined for me, I was watching the game recorded)
So I am not sure how Chicago scored their last 2 goals but up until that point when it was 2-0 Leafs weren't playing horrible they just couldn't get any bounces. Reimer was good
I'd like to hear an argument, backed by numbers/facts rather than a 1-game sample, that proves that either guy is clearly superior.
To me, they are virtually the same player. Fast, great hands, great shot. One just happens to play on a much better team.
We need a number 1 center obviously
It's comical really that wehaven't been able to get one since Mats
We had to trade for Gilmour and Sundin
Can we do it again ? does Nonis have the balls to give up something significant to get one?
The major advantage Kane has over Kessel is he shows up for the Hawks when they need him. He's a winner, he scores big goals. He is not afraid. Having an elite skilled player that is not afraid of contact, that can play in the dirty areas of the ice is an asset. Does Kessel do this? Yes when the game is a no hitter.