Goaltender interference review on ANA 3rd Goal (Warning in OP)

[nbducksfan19]

I would agree. But if you really look at the two disputed goalie interference calls as impartially as possible, it is hard not to find a problem with the objectivity employed in the review process.

I don't think they are objective (and shouldn't be). They were both close calls which thus were not overturned. Same thing with the high stick goal, I think that would have stood as a good goal if it were called a good goal on the ice. It really seems that the original call on the ice is incredibly important and it won't be overturned in instances where are legitimate argument can be made either way (which to me seems obvious in these few instances).

 

[snag]

Lol, what does that even mean? Why would the league favor a small market team over large hockey market team? Where's the logic in that?

I was always told that edmonton was the small market team.....we just have dare I say better or more passionate fans.

That said....we have proven we will fill our rink through years of sucking.

Think the ducks can make that claim?

 

[dracom]

I hope the Oilers score a similar goal and see the Ducks fans crying foul.

It's happened to us before, because Bieksa is an idiot who pushes players into Gibson all the time. We accept and move on.

 

[aufheben]

1k posts.

Closed.