SopelFanThe3rd
Cock of the Walk
Load management pairings:
Friedman-Aman
Foote-Gonchar
Allvin-Komisarek
Friedman-Aman
Foote-Gonchar
Allvin-Komisarek
GDT: [GM67] Canucks vs Avalanche | Wed. Mar 13th, 7:30pm | SNP | M2B Has Moderated This GDT
- Thread starter M2Beezy
- Start date
- Status
Grumbler
Registered User
- Oct 25, 2012
- 3,043
- 804
Thats a lot of loads to manage.
Wonder if Tocchet can take it all at the same time.
Wonder if Tocchet can take it all at the same time.
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 23,462
- 7,519
I assume Cole, and probably Myers, are the only guys that really need to be load managed near term given everyone else is pretty young.
Works fine with some combo of Hughes-Soucy-Cole-Zadorov down the left and Hronek-Juulsen-Myers-Friedman down the right. Can easily rotate a couple depth guys.
Works fine with some combo of Hughes-Soucy-Cole-Zadorov down the left and Hronek-Juulsen-Myers-Friedman down the right. Can easily rotate a couple depth guys.
Pastor Of Muppetz
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 26,224
- 16,126
SelltheTeamFrancesco
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2015
- 3,810
- 3,869
It’s called art until someone ruined it.
SopelFanThe3rd
Cock of the Walk
PG Canuck
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2010
- 63,103
- 24,464
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 23,462
- 7,519
They are like 21-3 or something with him in the line-up. He won’t be managed.
DFAC
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2008
- 7,325
- 4,935
Why would we need give Hughes favourable matchups? Let alone load manage him? He's only 24 and has generally been playing in the low 20m range. I'd expect an in-prime franchise 1D to be able to able to hit high 20 or 30+m and eat them all up with no issues.
Ian Cole, on the other hand, totally needs to be load managed.
Why the other hand specifically? Did you ask for consent?
I have so many questions.
Was hoping the Av's would have faced a tougher test at the Saddle-dome last night, but they laid a rather pedestrian 6-2 beatdown on the fading Flames.
So they probably won't be bothered by playing the second half of a back-to-back in Vancouver tomorrow night. Speed kills, and the Av's will likely be free-wheeling through the neutral zone.
Canucks need to establish their forecheck early.......and cash in on their PP's to win this one.
So they probably won't be bothered by playing the second half of a back-to-back in Vancouver tomorrow night. Speed kills, and the Av's will likely be free-wheeling through the neutral zone.
Canucks need to establish their forecheck early.......and cash in on their PP's to win this one.
PuckMunchkin
Very Nice, Very Evil!
The way I understand this is that, it's the travel and disrupted rest that does most of the "damage" on back to backs.
I’m amazed a certain poster hasn’t said “I’ll manage your load” yet. Unless I missed it.
BenningHurtsMySoul
Unfair Huggy Bear
I live in Calgary. Work gave me tickets to the Flames game vs Vegas tomorrow. They're on the glass by the goal line.
I am so tempted to wear my Pettersson jersey lmao
I am so tempted to wear my Pettersson jersey lmao
logan5
Registered User
MacKinnon is on the same level as McDavid right now, except the Avs have a way more complete team that McDavids Oilers. Going to have to have everyone playing at their best to get the W.
Mother of god! I’ve been depowered!
platotld
Fly Canucks Fly
Avs are in full winning mode. Topped up and ready to rumble. I look forward to this game, the next Dallas game, Vegas again at home and lastly the last game vs Jets. Hop-ing for a win, and not a shootout win but a tight, clean fought win.
Byram's gone so hoping Skinner does nothing stupid, or our Z Daddy will have to do the same.
Byram's gone so hoping Skinner does nothing stupid, or our Z Daddy will have to do the same.
BenningHurtsMySoul
Unfair Huggy Bear
There is not a player in the league I would look forward to playing less than Playoff MacKinnnon.
You should do it. I wore my Stecher (signed) jersey to a Kraken vs. Oilers game in Seattle a couple weeks ago lol
- Status
