Cap'n Flavour
Registered User
Nonis proved that he can trade expiring contracts of good-to-mediocre UFAs for picks. That is not a very unique skill. Oh, and Horton's cap hit will still limit the Leafs' flexibility in the off season.
Well, that's why we have to pleasure to continue to have Phaneuf in our lineup. Sometimes, you have to take less to just move on. We'll see if we can get anything better this summer I guess.
If Shanahan has plans to fire Nonis, sooner rather than later would be the opportune time. We've got a little less than 4 months till the draft, it'd be smart to let the new guy in now to establish a foothold before then.
If The Red Wings were offering us lowball deals, let's say Smith, Kindl and Weiss. Just guessing based on what we know. I trust the entire board would be in agreement, we'd all hang up on Holland.
And if we get less offered later, Holland will phone Nonis and laugh in his ear!
I have a feeling when the Rangers and or Habs go farther than the Red Wings do this spring, Holland will regret not paying the price for Dion to make it out of the east. It's wide open in this conference, up for grabs for any team to make it to the final. Could be the last kick at the cat for the group of Holland, Babcock, Daysyuk and Zetterberg. Nonis' patience may pay dividends. Regardless, The Red Wings may regret they didn't pay the price for Phaneuf when the east is so wide open.
i think a portion of the issue is the new arena in Detroit + Zetterburg & Datsyuk getting up in age. I feel that Holland wants Mantha/Larkin to be the headliners .
However. i don't know. My feeling is that Holland and Nonis were playing chicken, Holland blinked and got Zidilicky and played it safe. (at the very least, I would have at least counted for Polak (a righty for Mr. Picky Babcock) and paid a 1st (or 2 2nds, or whatever) get some grit and vinegar into that line up on the backend.
I'm not mad 1 iota for Nonis standing firm on that. I would have retained for a 1st, Larkin/Mantha, Weiss, and Smith. no questions. (i would have even capitulated on the 1st, for 2 2nds). Detroit will be interesting, that is for sure.
Detroit didn't do as much as Montreal or NY. They don't deserve to win the East with small conservative moves IMO.
Boston went for it when they dealt for Kaberle, they won the cup. Years ago Calgary dealt Brett Hull and won a cup.
Sure losing Larkin or Mantha would hurt, but this was the year the Red Wings should have been all in. Babcock may not return, and Datsyuk and Zetterberg are not getting any younger. If Detroit have an early exit, Wings fans at the least can question did Holland do enough. Only time will tell, but this could be the last kick at the can for them for awhile.
TSN had the "Stanley Cup Winner trade board" near the end. most winners tend to make a HUGE splash. this is why I'm curious why Anaheim tinkered themselves. Yeah they got Wiz, but... (shrug). if i knew Chicago was struggling, LA was struggling, San Jose's San Jose, and St Louis has this issues, i would have made sure my defense was shored up firmly with Dion (and what? that's Theodore, a 1st and a dump + dump?) they completely 'tinkered' their back end today but nothing screams "awesome. I think we can all agree Dion in the 3-4 slot is much better than Dion in the 1 slot. (and in case of injury dion CAN move up). we'll see. (and maybe early exits make people make silly decisions)
TSN had the "Stanley Cup Winner trade board" near the end. most winners tend to make a HUGE splash. this is why I'm curious why Anaheim tinkered themselves. Yeah they got Wiz, but... (shrug). if i knew Chicago was struggling, LA was struggling, San Jose's San Jose, and St Louis has this issues, i would have made sure my defense was shored up firmly with Dion (and what? that's Theodore, a 1st and a dump + dump?) they completely 'tinkered' their back end today but nothing screams "awesome. I think we can all agree Dion in the 3-4 slot is much better than Dion in the 1 slot. (and in case of injury dion CAN move up). we'll see. (and maybe early exits make people make silly decisions)
Ya think? Their goalies steal games and Bozak/Kessel etc. sometimes have a good game when the other team is tired. Keeping the core might mean being higher in the standings than they otherwise would be?Just seems like there should've been more done... dunno.
Detroit didn't do as much as Montreal or NY. They don't deserve to win the East with small conservative moves IMO.
Boston went for it when they dealt for Kaberle, they won the cup. Years ago Calgary dealt Brett Hull and won a cup.
Sure losing Larkin or Mantha would hurt, but this was the year the Red Wings should have been all in. Babcock may not return, and Datsyuk and Zetterberg are not getting any younger. If Detroit have an early exit, Wings fans at the least can question did Holland do enough. Only time will tell, but this could be the last kick at the can for them for awhile.
So, me and my bud are having an intense debate.
(This is an extremely condensed "coles notes" of the actual coversation)
He believes that Shanahan has evaluated Nonis, thinks he is the guy, surrounded him with a top flight management group (Dubas, Hunter, Prindholm) and Nonis will be the guy to tear it down, and rebuild it.
I said, that Nonis hasn't shown me any reason why, after 8 years, he should be given another chance to build this team. Nonis was never going to be fired until this summer, and that Shanahan didn't finish his evaluation until February when he got permission from the board to tear it down. Too hard to fire/hire a GM in February, weeks from the deadline
He said bringing in a new GM, weeks from the biggest draft in franchise history, in which we will likely be trading the majority of our core, and drafting a player that will be a center piece of our team, would be idiotic.
So, my question, which he couldn't answer at all, what reason is there to give Nonis another shot at building the Maple Leafs?
So, me and my bud are having an intense debate.
(This is an extremely condensed "coles notes" of the actual coversation)
He believes that Shanahan has evaluated Nonis, thinks he is the guy, surrounded him with a top flight management group (Dubas, Hunter, Prindholm) and Nonis will be the guy to tear it down, and rebuild it.
I said, that Nonis hasn't shown me any reason why, after 8 years, he should be given another chance to build this team. Nonis was never going to be fired until this summer, and that Shanahan didn't finish his evaluation until February when he got permission from the board to tear it down. Too hard to fire/hire a GM in February, weeks from the deadline
He said bringing in a new GM, weeks from the biggest draft in franchise history, in which we will likely be trading the majority of our core, and drafting a player that will be a center piece of our team, would be idiotic.
So, my question, which he couldn't answer at all, what reason is there to give Nonis another shot at building the Maple Leafs?
First let me say I do not want Nonis as our GM moving forward as I want to get rid of all of Burke's people.
One reason for him to stay is easy.....he was simply playing the hand that Burke dealt him.