http://www.csnne.com/boston-bruins/joe-haggerty-whats-holdup-on-boston-bruins-naming-gm
good stuff
logically it makes so much sense- why is it taking so long????
I'm very confident this is Charlie Jacobs for Jeff Gorton and Cam Neely for Don Sweeney
we win either way if we get one of them but this is really bizarre to me
bcbruin1 knows that sly dog and sure sounds like Jeff Gorton never shook the black and gold blood out of him when he left
if we are sitting here next week then this is certainly not a great confidence boster for Don Sweeney if he ends up the GM like I think he will
maybe this will be like a Belichick opting out of JETS to come home and Gorton will tell Sather this is what he wants and where his heart is
I don't think he cares about confidence at the point. I am very much not in the know, or even connected to the org. I will as this, is it possible that Jacobs and Neely are asking Sweeney to show them his long term plan? Is it also possible that Sweeney being the Harvard guy he is, isn't half-assing it?
This is my guess as to why this is taking so long. I think that Jacobs and Neely both want to see a hard plan, not just a bunch of crap thrown against a wall. "I want to get tougher and harder to play against" or "We need to find players that work hard and want to play here" or "I invision a team that s fast, skilled, and tough". I think they want something concrete, not just a vision, but a plan on how that will be executed through drafting, trades, and free agency.
I know if I was sitting there, I would be asking for a wholehearted breakdown of what Sweeney plans to do, who he wants where, and what his plan is now and 5 years from now. I want that from him every off-season. I also want to see contingency plans and how he intends to approach the deadline from each position (Contender, strong team, bubble team, seller). I wouldn't want these things simply talked about, I would want them written down so I could reference them when my GM comes to me and tells me he's trading away my prized pig for a couple pieces of cooked bacon and a summer ham.
How does this move fit with the directive outlined? Why are we doing this now? How does the return fit with the directive outlined? What is the contingency if this doesn't work?
I tend to think that this is more Jacobs, Neely, and Sweeney doing this the right way. I don't believe it has anything to do with Gorton or anyone else. I would also go as far to say that they will likely go back and forth on the plan a few times to ensure that the plan is in line with the organisational culture.