Still waiting for someone to write an accurate article.
"The Tortorella/injury effect.Media completely wrong, Canucks players not over the hill."
Did Benning magically take players like the Sedins, Burrows, Edler, Hansen, Matthias and make them play better? Or could it maybe have been the laughable deployment of these players mixed with several injuries to key players?
Benning wasn't handed even close as bad a hand as the media is trying to force feed the public into thinking. I had this team in the 4-8 region in the conference before the season and stick to it now. it's the same team basically, with the changes being:
Kesler for Bonino. At best it's a saw off. Thank Kesler for asking to leave, because his cancerous attitude wasn't helping.
Luongo for Miller. Luongo is performing better right now, but thank the Panthers for agreeing to take another cancer off the Canucks hands. Problem is, Benning may have replaced one headache with a more expensive one.
Garrison for Sbisa. Leading the Lightning with 16 points as a defencemen, and Van's best being 9 from Edler, Garrison ( like the Sedins, Burrows, Hansen, Edler) was a victim of Tortorella's deployment. Sbisa with 4 points and a minus 2 being compared to a 16 point and +10 Garrison is laughable, and I can see why posters think the new GM is god when they get their opinion from the online articles.
Vrbata has been great, but he also publicly stated he was looking to play with the Sedins when his contract was up and there was 15 million to work with.
The biggest difference has been getting rid of Tortorella and being relatively healthy (might be in trouble soon with Hamhuis, Kassian and Matthias out).
If there is one guy that deserves credit it's Dejardins. I'll be ready to give him more credit if the team maintains it's play if these injuries continue to occur...because if you remember, even Tortorella got good results using the same players until injuries and over usage came into play.