yeah but if Delia at .893 is above average then suddenly their sv%'s don't look as God-awful when viewed through that same lens. Still bad but not "holding this team back from being much better" bad.
Well I'm looking at it through the lens of goals saved above expected. The stats within the stats. Basically all save%'s aren't created equal. GSAE shows how goalies are performing individually without taking the players in front of them into account.
How much the goaltending is holding the team back is up for debate, but I would argue they're holding the team back just enough to not completely dismiss the issue like fans usually do with goaltending so often. That's just my personal opinion though. It would be interesting to hear from someone like
@mossey3535 about this.
It isn't holding us back, BUT this team and it's fans are so used to the team playing no defense and getting bailed out by elite goaltending that having normal goaltending comes as a shock.
There is a stark contrast between our goaltending this year and when Demko was leading the league in 5 on 5 save percent last year. If we had that all year, Bruce probably isn't fired and we probably either scrape in or barely miss and get a garbage pick. Almost a wholly good thing they didnt have it so they can't hide behind team save percent as a reason to not properly address the defensive personnel and system.
Exactly! I think fans in Vancouver are so used to good goaltending that when the team actually doesn't have it they just point to the D. They don't even know what bad goaltending looks like.
I also agree that it's good that the team doesn't have excellent goaltending to hide the massive flaws with the defence anymore. It all had to be exposed.