I'd be okay with Darryl or Barry...
Brain did the thing where I read it as "Darryl or Barryl" and was like, "what is that name/who is this??"
I don't know enough about Peters other than he's an Alberta kid, coaching a failing Hurricanes franchise. In other words, "perfect for the job"...
At this point I'm definitely into a more experienced coach (10+ years in the NHL as a head coach) who has a consistent playoff resume, who isn't known to be too friendly with the players on a daily basis. It's fine to be "a player's coach" but at the end of the day there must be some professional separation of duties. I don't know whether that means Vigneault or Trotz or Sutter or whomever is the best choice, but the team isn't really at a point where they need "a young promising coach who can grow with a young, promising team." That was 3-4 seasons ago; now the team needs "an experienced coach who can guide a young, inconsistent team to win."
My greatest criticism of Gulutzan, aside from his other shortcomings (misuse of roster/slow to change, temper tantrums, etc.) is the belief that I simply felt he did not read the flow of the game well. He was prone to over-reliance on Coach's Challenges to the point that he rarely ever used his timeouts, whether the team was down by 1 with 3 minutes to go (not that they played well at all 6 on 5 regardless) or the team had just been scored on 3 times within 5 minutes in the top of the second.
Time and again, he refused to support his bench with extra time when it was needed most - something that Hartley understood far better. It was almost a sort of arrogance, in the way he denied the usage of the timeout as a coaching tool, relying on the technology around him to gauge whether an opposing player was half an inch offside instead.