Spooner st
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2007
- 12,944
- 8,100
Exactly.If they were sending him to Moncton why the delay?
I really hope they do the right thing.
Last edited:
Exactly.If they were sending him to Moncton why the delay?
Imo what he needs is specific heavy intense training then quality playing minutes.It’s my understanding that Andersson and his camp want to be in Providence, but some in the organization just don’t think he’s ready for the AHL— I agree with those who think that. I simply don’t think he’s ready for action against this competition and should be dealt with a great deal of patience.
Andersson needs to be logging heavy, intense minutes and he just won’t be able to get that in Providence, especially with Petrovic in the picture now.
You have Vaakanainen, Zboril, Zech, Lauzon, Petrovic, Breen, Didier, Petrovic *and* Sherman in Providence— where does Andersson fit there? He doesn’t.
I don't think the Bruins have a ton of career AHL'ers in Providence.I've already posted multiple times my views on it.
Imo Andersson should play ahead of career AHL'ers.
He is an Important prospect and should be handled accordingly.
Something gotta give.I don't think the Bruins have a ton of career AHL'ers in Providence.
Zboril, Lauzon, Vaakanainen, Zech aren't career AHL'ers. Sherman might not be. Petrovic is heading back down after a few years in the NHL. Didier and Breen I'll give you, but there's a very good chance someone like Kampfer from the Bruins heads back down when Miller and Moore are back.
Andersson isn't going to get slotted above those guys and needs consistent playing time. Breen and Petrovic could go to the ECHL, but with this influx of youth in Providence, they need their leadership vets and Breen has pretty consistently been wearing an A.
Its starting to get pretty crowded down there.
Something gotta give.
Yes and that something is the 19-year-old defenseman who just isn’t ready for that level yet.
This isn’t the same case as someone like Vaakanainen who was dominating at his position in the league he was playing in at the same age. Andersson wasn’t really separating himself last year in Allsvenskan and hasn’t done enough to do so in camps this year either, IMO.
I’m not as high on him as others, but there’s still potential there and I think going to the CHL is the right move for him a this stage. He needs to play somewhere they can deploy him regularly each night and play in all situations— he literally won’t get that chance in Providence.
It's about the caliber of the teaching plus it will/would be personalized.He'll be press box or 3rd pairing, limited minutes in Providence. I just don't see how that's better for his development than Moncton, even if it is a lower caliber league.
He'll be press box or 3rd pairing, limited minutes in Providence. I just don't see how that's better for his development than Moncton, even if it is a lower caliber league.
There sure are some stupid NHL teams that love to rush their prospects, fortunately Boston is not one of them though.I may have to see some extra games in Hartford just to see Lauko this year. I truly believe he would be on a handful of NHL teams opening night rosters. He was my dark horse this year and although he didn't make it, he didn't disappoint.
It's about the caliber of the teaching plus it will/would be personalized.
Be honest when was the last time you saw him play?There sure are some stupid NHL teams that love to rush their prospects, fortunately Boston is not one of them though.
Lauko is not NHL ready, I am surprised how much love he gets on this board. I would be surprised if he's an impact player in the AHL. Good prospect though, progressing well for a 3rd rounder (still don't understand how he fell there, should have been a sure-fire 2nd rounder.)
He's already under contract.At the end of the day, if the player isn't really ready for the league, then it's not his best option. Going to Moncton allows Boston to add a contract if need be. It will also allow him to play big minutes and all situations there, something he will not get in Providence. The caliber of teaching in Providence may be better, but if he's not able to utilize it in games, how does it help? Boston wouldn't send him to Moncton if they didn't think he'd get used properly, or if they didn't think he'd get adequate teaching/coaching there.
It's about the caliber of the teaching plus it will/would be personalized.
He's already under contract.
What team or teams still has room for another import at this stage of the season?John Torchetti is an excellent coach as is Darryl Boyce in Moncton. Besides, the Bruins will be in constant contact by either their Q scouts or Jammie Langenbrunner and Chris Kelly on what he needs to work on.
There are plenty of coaches in the CHL I would rather have developing my players over coaches in the AHL. To say he won't get coaching in Moncton is, well, asinine.
Give me a player developed by Dale Hunter or Stan Butler over players developed by 99% of the coaches in the A.
And to @Saxon Eric
Moncton is not in a normal situation. They have two potential players coming to them under NHL contract that would require an import spot. They only have room for one, so they are going to have to make a deal once their NHL clubs decide what to do. And those teams are cognizant of that fact and will give Moncton management the time they need.
What team or teams still has room for another import at this stage of the season?
Preseason game against Philadelphia.Be honest when was the last time you saw him play?
I'll repeat what I said.John Torchetti is an excellent coach as is Darryl Boyce in Moncton. Besides, the Bruins will be in constant contact by either their Q scouts or Jammie Langenbrunner and Chris Kelly on what he needs to work on.
There are plenty of coaches in the CHL I would rather have developing my players over coaches in the AHL. To say he won't get coaching in Moncton is, well, asinine.
Give me a player developed by Dale Hunter or Stan Butler over players developed by 99% of the coaches in the A.
And to @Saxon Eric
Moncton is not in a normal situation. They have two potential players coming to them under NHL contract that would require an import spot. They only have room for one, so they are going to have to make a deal once their NHL clubs decide what to do. And those teams are cognizant of that fact and will give Moncton management the time they need.
John Torchetti is an excellent coach as is Darryl Boyce in Moncton. Besides, the Bruins will be in constant contact by either their Q scouts or Jammie Langenbrunner and Chris Kelly on what he needs to work on.
To bad Senyshyn wasn't intitle to this support from Bruins.
Since they've been working on his game for years now.
He got to Providence as a really rough prospect.
There are plenty of coaches in the CHL I would rather have developing my players over coaches in the AHL. To say he won't get coaching in Moncton is, well, asinine.
Between Providence or Moncton coaching bruins prospects who do you think will do a better job?
Give me a player developed by Dale Hunter or Stan Butler over players developed by 99% of the coaches in the A.
Too bad the only one we had developed by Dale Hunter was Jared Knight.
Of course I won't blame Hunter for Knight shortcomings.
And to @Saxon Eric
Moncton is not in a normal situation. They have two potential players coming to them under NHL contract that would require an import spot. They only have room for one, so they are going to have to make a deal once their NHL clubs decide what to do. And those teams are cognizant of that fact and will give Moncton management the time they need.
Right now, I would rather the coaches in Moncton, with Bruins input, develop Andersson. At least for this season. They can work with him on all aspects of his game right now, an opportunity he won't get in Providence. And that's over and above all the contractual reasons that favor Moncton over Providence, which also has to play a factor.
Agreed
Actually, don't forget Seth Griffith. Knight didn't come without issues. Hunter tried to work with him, but some players just won't buy into it. I won't say Knight was another Jesse Gabrielle because he wasn't. But like Gabrielle, there was something else there that you and 99.9% of the people here aren't aware of.
Agreed
As for Senyshyn, I still think he'll carve out a productive NHL career. I know many here think he's a bust. We clamor for a 23 year old NCAA graduate to be on the roster because "he's finally ready" but we are just as quick to call a junior player a bust at age 21 because he's not. I also know the immediate reaction will be to look at draft position, but there's a whole different set of circumstances on when to draft a player from the NCAA versus the USHL, CHL or Europe.
The reason I mentioned Senyshyn is, why didn't the Soo Greyhounds developed Senyshyn with the Bruins input. The same way Moncton would develop Andersson?