Same response as I would have answered. To clarify, boys are really dumb and I'd rather them be close to more intelligent people. I was pretty immature and dumb well past 25, most boys are the same. Girls are not perfect but overall much better at those ages. That's my opinion.
I've taken some time before responding to this and would like to think some of your comments on this are flippant. Not calling you out, just your comments were springboard to my comments.
I've delayed too, from commenting at length first observing that the discussion of sexuality is considered OK here as a thread. Well OK then. Why is it acceptable in our society to deem males of the species dumb? Why is "toxic masculinity" an acceptable term yet we don't have similar terms for other identified sexes? I state this because in therapy a problem I was often encountering in clients was males Non accepting their own sex type characteristics. (I'm talking hetero males with this as well) that were social learned throughout their life, rather it be in school, or from one parent (primarily female parent-mom) families that aspects of their maleness was unacceptable, to be discouraged, that boys will be boys was considered less becoming. "Don't be like your father".
We're not more accepting sexually as a society, we're selectively accepting and if anything battle of the sexes is more pronounced in present day. Its inescapable to me, from clinical exposure that male characteristics are increasingly discouraged now in western society. Not just male ABUSE characteristics, but maleness in general, being described as toxic.
Males are taught from earliest age that they are dumb archetypes, that we're homer simpsons, Al Bundys, Archie Bunkers and that females or other expressions of sexuality are better, instead of equal..
A latter comment but confusion also exists in modern times about the complex and varied expressions of sexuality. Part of the "coming out" hubris is that we are still expecting some clear notion of what preferences are being expressed. So that while expressions of homogenous attraction is increasingly accepted you hear less public people coming out now as bisexual, pansexual, etc. Its like we still want to wrap sexuality into tidy packages while ignoring that in the Animal Kingdom, and in humans sexual preferences can be varied and encompassing and involving a range of sexual attraction. So that we may not just be hetero, homo, etc. I've even heard postulation from couples in therapy that saying you are bi is a cop out, that its non committal, non monogamist, despite many males in same sex relations having multiple partners. Its an interesting thing to explore. I've even seen it expressed that a male with a same sex partner is more threatened by pan sexual explorations of the partner. and especially hetero attraction.
That we still expect people to come out or express their sexuality and in nice tidy discernible packages is still very much indicative that we are prohibitive about sexual expressions
So that its a fascinatingly complex area.