Very Stable Genius
#WeLostOurKarlssons
We've changed tons of players, mostly for the worse I might add. Its an organizational structure issue
I know it won't happen, but it should. Anyways we'll see who replaces Boucher next year in November or December.
(Paraphrasing) "I may be completely wrong, I don't know anything, but my feeling is that Guy Boucher isn't going anywhere during the season OR at season's end".
This was on the pre-game show before Sens Leafs Feb 10 on TSN1200.
I have no doubt that 65 will be much closer to his normal self next year (not 12/8 on July 1 confident, but still).
I am worried that we are looking at the new Anderson.
No, we don't. We should be looking at coaches in the summer, not midseason. Wait till midseason and you end up with our farm team coach, Crawford or someone who wasn't good enough to be picked up in the summer.But that's the thing.
What we are talking about here is Boucher making it to the start of next season.
Next season being the last year of his contract works both ways: it makes it less painful to let him go when he has one season left on his deal.
What I am saying is firing him before October or November of this year doesn't make sense.
He will be on a very short leash next season. As it should be.
So we agree.
No, we don't. We should be looking at coaches in the summer, not midseason. Wait till midseason and you end up with our farm team coach, Crawford or someone who wasn't good enough to be picked up in the summer.
We don’t have money for any of those coaches if other team also offer them jobs.Maybe they are waiting to see if any other ‘real’ coaches get turfed this summer.
That is no doubt what is happening. For this first time ever, no coaches have been fired this season.
There's nothing sensible about expecting something to change that has been one way for years. There's absolutely no reason to believe Boucher will change anything about how he operates. There's no downside to bringing in New blood.
I know it won't happen, but it should. Anyways we'll see who replaces Boucher next year in November or December.
Well that’s the thing. I mean people over think this. Yes. Our owner is eccentric and an ass. But if we had a smart GM and smart people around him that identified good players and added them identified bad players and subtracted them and drafted well (not saying we don’t draft well) and we were a good team. None of this matters that much. You think anyone gives a shit about the owner being an ass if we’re successful?We've changed tons of players, mostly for the worse I might add. Its an organizational structure issue
Well we better do nothing to remedy the problems with the team. We can take the Boucher approach and just let the opposition come at us relentlessly, on the ice, on the bench and in the GM's office. Maybe we should give Boucher an extension now? Just sit back and accept our fate.There's also no reason to believe based on the Sens recent track record that they won't "play for one year then bomb the next" again regardless of which coach the Sens theoretically hire.
Boucher now has a 30-some game audition to show everyone that he can adapt. If he keeps insisting on his tactics and we see no change in execution, then he probably isn’t back in September. If he does show an ability to adapt then it’s a free upgrade.Well we better do nothing to remedy the problems with the team. We can take the Boucher approach and just let the opposition come at us relentlessly, on the ice, on the bench and in the GM's office. Maybe we should give Boucher an extension now? Just sit back and accept our fate.
Meh ,we have been firing coaches over and over again,maybe its time we change the players??
Well we better do nothing to remedy the problems with the team. We can take the Boucher approach and just let the opposition come at us relentlessly, on the ice, on the bench and in the GM's office. Maybe we should give Boucher an extension now? Just sit back and accept our fate.
If Boucher can adjust to the "new NHL" then I don't mind this because he is a brilliant hockey mind
look at maurice from winnipeg he’s still th coach regardless of his losing %It doesn't make sense to fire the coach after one bad season.
People see his education and think he's smart. Then they see he's employed by a pro hockey and see he's a hockey guy. You add it all up he's a smart hockey guy on paper just not in practice.See this a lot. But where does this come from? I don't see it. I see a guy who seems to quickly alienate players and refuses to budge when things aren't working.
Look at Winnipeg's roster.look at maurice from winnipeg he’s still th coach regardless of his losing %
Until he's fired 11 games into next season ala MacLean
Yes, the players obviously do as reflected by Turris and his wife speaking out when he left the organization.Well that’s the thing. I mean people over think this. Yes. Our owner is eccentric and an ass. But if we had a smart GM and smart people around him that identified good players and added them identified bad players and subtracted them and drafted well (not saying we don’t draft well) and we were a good team. None of this matters that much. You think anyone gives a **** about the owner being an ass if we’re successful?