GDT: Game 48: Coyotes @ Wild - 6:30 PM - FSAZ - On the Road Again

[Ebb]

I wanted to see vermette in the so

 

[MIGs Dog]

Can't believe we won that game. F the refs

 

[howlincoyote2k1]

The puck doesn't lie.

 

[Tad Mikowski]

Had no business being in that game. But that's what a good goalie can do for you

 

[Etch]

Great to see them pull the win out after that brutal OT robbery

 

[Muppet]

Coyotes just pulled off a Casino Heist for those two points. Crazy.

Seriously though, what the hell is wrong with the officiating this season? It's a serious problem league-wide. There's absolutely zero common sense from the refs this season.

 

[Mosby]

Stole that one.

Not sure how that OT goal didn't count. These refs lately... I'd like to see Tipp express his frustration and take the $10k hit.

 

[moosemeister]

We've been getting screwed on the goals disallowed. But whatever, we won. I'll take it.

 

[Lyotes]

With the new coaches challenge maybe the league needs to look into redefining what they consider goaltender interference.

 

[SR]

Had no business being in that game. But that's what a good goalie can do for you

Agreed.

Duclair with such amazing skill its unreal.

 

[RemoAZ]

Better stick Duclair back on the bottom line. He was bringing too much excitement to the game. Don't want that to tire everyone out.

 

[CBJ goalie]

Awesome they pulled out a win from a 6-shots-in-40-minutes game, but man, that disallowed goal was BS.
No interference at all, Boedker was just skating across the top of the crease.
Great 2 points.

 

[RemoAZ]

On to hated Blake Wheeler. Time for some blood!

 

[Bonsai Tree]

Tinprdi played well.

 

[Bondurant]

Sounds like Domingue thinks interference was the right call. Perhaps it's just the goalie in him talking out loud.

I won't fault the call but the review looked pretty clear to mine eyes.

 

[0point1]

With the new coaches challenge maybe the league needs to look into redefining what they consider goaltender interference.

Need this: http://www.nhlwheelofjustice.com/

For goalie interference.

 

[CC96]

So, anyone still want to trade Domingue? What a game by him!

I don't think anybody wanted that. At least I hope to God, nobody did.

 

[thekernel]

That was THE single weakest goaltender interference call of the year. Absolutely hosed. Robbed. They even reviewed it FFS...

 

[CC96]

Better stick Duclair back on the bottom line. He was bringing too much excitement to the game. Don't want that to tire everyone out.

He might score like Peter Forsberg again. Can't have that.

 

[cobra427]

Need this: http://www.nhlwheelofjustice.com/

For goalie interference.

The NHL is not going to over turn a call unless it is a no brainer. The call on the ice is almost always going to stand. If the goal was good on the ice and the Wild challenged it, the NHL would not over turn it. You just need to get the call on the ice in your favor.

As for the game, we stole the points. Mini so out played us but LD was just awesome, he won it for us. OEL is our only D man that can get to the puck quickly and make a good quick decision. We are in desperate need of a PMD. Mini's first pass from behind the goal line is so much better.

 

[Summer Rose]

I just watched the replay of the challenged goal.

I dunno, Boedker brushes into Dubnyk's right pad right before the shot goes in. Did he have enough time to re-establish his position in the crease to have the opportunity to make the save? That's subjective. The referee didn't think he did. It could have been ruled either way, and was so momentary that a challenge/review was never going to overturn the call on the ice.

 

[Mosby]

This goalie interference stuff is starting to remind me of the foot-in-the-crease garbage from the late 90's.

 

[Sinurgy]

That game was all Domingue and Duclair. Nice to be on the right side of stealing a game for once.

 

[MIGs Dog]

I just watched the replay of the challenged goal.

I dunno, Boedker brushes into Dubnyk's right pad right before the shot goes in. Did he have enough time to re-establish his position in the crease to have the opportunity to make the save? That's subjective. The referee didn't think he did. It could have been ruled either way, and was so momentary that a challenge/review was never going to overturn the call on the ice.

I would be OK with the call if there was consistency.in the officiating about what is, and what is not interference.

 

[Matias Maccete]

I would be OK with the call if there was consistency.in the officiating about what is, and what is not interference.

This. Ming the merciless has had several goals with more contact than this not be ruled interference. If they want to say pretty much any and all contact is interference (which is the camp I'm in anyway) great, but consistency is the key here.