Post-Game Talk: GAME 35 - HAPPY NEW YEAR - BRUINS 5 Detroit 3

[Fenway]

Game Summary

Event Summary

Full Play-By-Play

Faceoff Comparison

Faceoff Summary

Time On Ice: DET

Time On Ice: BOS​

Click to read more...

 

[Alicat]

 

[Score8]

It’s called redwings hockey

 

[BruinsFanMike82]

 

[Si Hopkins]

Freddy is a good hockey player. He wanted the hatty tonight.

 

[Gordoff]

BALLS TO THE WALLS WIN, HAPPY NEW YEAR ALL!

 

[aguineapig72]

No.11 was skating like the Ghost of Swoop Carleton tonite,

 

[Bruinfanatic]

Freddy is a good hockey player. He wanted the hatty tonight.

Yeah felt sorry for him he had to watch both empty netter going in .

 

[Fenway]

Challenge Initiated By: Boston

Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference

Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit

Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

 

[Score8]

Challenge Initiated By: Boston

Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference

Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit

Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

All the angles I’ve seen Carlos stick is pulling the opposing players stick away from swayman .

 

[Gordoff]

Challenge Initiated By: Boston

Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference

Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit

Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

What a joke of a league... NHLOL!

 

[ProdigalFan]

Jaffe just talked about that explanation, which wasn't what the ref said at all.

 

[bwunderlich]

Charron and McCauley did all they could.

Gutsy road win!!

 

[Gordoff]

View attachment 793650
It’s called redwings hockey

Quick ref look, I've been tripped~!!!!

 

[quietbruinfan]

I only watched from the 11:05 mark of the second until the end of the second, when they played poorly, got screwed by the refs, and were scored upon twice in an 8:55 stretch. I am superstitious, so I turned it off, and they played better and won. Draw your own conclusions. lol

 

[Guelph Bruin]

Enjoyed that game more than most this year...great team building win...and Zacha learned to clear the zone on the 6-5 and got himself a goal! Trent needs to bring that type of game more consistently..hell of a player when he's engaged (not talking about his goals but they were a bonus)

 

[DarrenBanks56]

great game by wotherspoon.
thats a loss if Gryz is in there.
nice to get a win with pasta not doing much

 

[GloveSave1]

Challenge Initiated By: Boston

Type of Challenge: Goaltender Interference

Result: Call on the ice is upheld – Goal Detroit

Explanation: After video review, it was determined that the actions of Brandon Carlo contributed to Detroit’s Michael Rasmussen’s stick making contact with Jeremy Swayman’s glove outside the crease and therefore, did not constitute goaltender interference. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 69.1 which states, in part, that the goal should be allowed because “Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease…”

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

Just like the Cowboys game, they can always say whatever and cover their butt.

 

[Terrier]

The Red Weasels are 0-16-1 when scoring three or fewer goals.

 

[Gordoff]

Charron and McCauley did all they could.

Gutsy road win!!

Yet another disgraceful "job" done on the Bruins by NHL refs.
But Bruins didn't wilt!

 

[eightspokedb]

That was fun.

Happy New Years to all y'all!!

I have a piece of red velvet cake to enjoy.....

 

[Gordoff]

I only watched from the 11:05 mark of the second until the end of the second, when they played poorly, got screwed by the refs and were scored upon twice in an 8:55 stretch. I am superstitious, so I turned it off, and they played better and won. Draw your own conclusions. lol

Happy BirthDay!

 

[winterwill]

"One went in, we all went in" - Sway

 

[Fenway]

 

[hrdpuk]

No way they were going to lose today . They had the winning attatude right from the get-go