GDT: Game 33: Sharks vs. Desert somethings 7:30pm ESPN+/Hulu

[karltonian]

eh. that would have been a better call than the original call

 

[slocal]

eh. that would have been a better call than the original call

Nope. One could argue that he was bracing.

 

[Pavelski2112]

Eklund is so much fun to watch

 

[Bizz]

Eklund dancing all over this team, he's due for one or two.

 

[karltonian]

wrecklund is all over the place

 

[Anomie2029]

Eklund-Hertl-Zadina is fun to watch.

Watching Ferraro bumblef*** the puck isn’t.

Blackwood’s play has come back down to earth.

 

[Pavelski2112]

Eklund-Hertl-Zadina is fun to watch.

Watching Ferraro bumblef*** the puck isn’t.

Blackwood’s play has come back down to earth.

Ferraro is by far the most frustrating player on this team. He makes plays that would be great if he could do anything except immediately fumbling them.

 

[bluefunnel]

Zadina!!!

 

[Pavelski2112]

I'll take it lmao

 

[slocal]

The red-headed stepchild!

 

[Alaskanice]

Zadina!!!

 

[karltonian]

lol and that goes in
sucks that didn't go in right off that kewl spin-o-rama

 

[Tw1ster]

Who said Zadina doesn’t have a good shot!?

 

[Bizz]

That was some special goaltending by Vejmelka there.

 

[karltonian]

Who said Zadina doesn’t have a good shot!?

I take it all back, his poke shot is elite!

 

[Chinaski89]

zadina is keeping things going but his shot is disappointing

You were saying… /s lol

 

[Mrs Ski]

Every time I leave the room the Sharks score.

One of those games.

 

[Juxtaposer]

Tssss Zadina totally stole that goal from Willie Ek.

 

[The Nemesis]

Attempt at a joke. I see your point.

Apologies for misreading your intent. It's just that with a history of being legitimately combative and critical of posters for expressing negativity about aspects of the team/players it's difficult to tell the difference between it being in jest and being in earnest without some sort of stronger identifier.

 

[slocal]

Apologies for misreading your intent. It's just that with a history of being legitimately combative and critical of posters for expressing negativity about aspects of the team/players it's difficult to tell the difference between it being in jest and being in earnest without some sort of stronger identifier.

Just say you got your wires crossed again. Much more to the point.

 

[karltonian]

god this defending is giving me conniptions

Apologies for misreading your intent. It's just that with a history of being legitimately combative and critical of posters for expressing negativity about aspects of the team/players it's difficult to tell the difference between it being in jest and being in earnest without some sort of stronger identifier.

"It was a joke" smh
You read it right IMO. This is just a backpedal/excuse/gaslight

 

[slocal]

god this defending is giving me conniptions


"It was a joke" smh

I thought it was Phunny.

 

[karltonian]

I thought it was Phunny.

It doesn't even make sense as a joke

okh has a few rough games

 

[Juxtaposer]

Apologies for misreading your intent. It's just that with a history of being legitimately combative and critical of posters for expressing negativity about aspects of the team/players it's difficult to tell the difference between it being in jest and being in earnest without some sort of stronger identifier.

Clarity is a beautiful thing.

It was Schrödinger’s joke—if no one got upset about it, it was serious, but if someone did, it’s a joke!!

 

[Alaskanice]

Apologies for misreading your intent. It's just that with a history of being legitimately combative and critical of posters for expressing negativity about aspects of the team/players it's difficult to tell the difference between it being in jest and being in earnest without some sort of stronger identifier.

It’s tough to garner through words on a screen. I admit I get dragged down by the negativity. This is my only outlet to talk about the Sharks.