CherryToke
Registered User
So now people are *****ing about Luongo because he doesn't get enough shutoutzzz?
more like laughing about it. why does he get the yips in the last couple minutes of games?
So now people are *****ing about Luongo because he doesn't get enough shutoutzzz?
more like laughing about it. why does he get the yips in the last couple minutes of games?
Looks like a mixture of bad luck and poor defensive breakdowns in front of him.
more like laughing about it. why does he get the yips in the last couple minutes of games?
Who is that... Eric Walsky? I remember one of the big posters having a weird Walsky fetish...*doesn't watch game*
*looks at scoresheet*
Luongo HAS to be better at closing out games.
*analysis concluded*
Looks like a mixture of bad luck and poor defensive breakdowns in front of him.
It's almost certainly a mixture of those two things and Luongo's own fault as well. He is sometimes at fault for goals he surrenders, we can agree on that right?
"Whoever is not against us is for us" (Luke 9:50; Mark 9:40).
ok but he deals with that crap all game long. strange that he suddenly becomes mortal in the last couple minutes.
Dan Cloutier won 30+ games a season with that goal output from the team.If we score 3 goals we win.
Dan Cloutier won 30+ games a season with that goal output from the team.
True. Cloutier was a pretty good regular season goalie.
Complaining about Luo letting in a meaningless goal in the last 7 seconds is a bit like compalining about Scarlett Johansson having a mole. Ok, not quite but you get my drift.
I avoid this place after a loss because of all the crap posted in here, and now it's getting depressing to come here after a win as well!
Will we never be happy for a damn win? It's two points, that's the goal of each game, goal accomplished....let's move on
If we score 3 goals we win.
Luongo was good when he needed to be in the 1st period when the Aves were coming in waves.
Santorelli continues to be worth more than his weight in gold. Even if his production falls off I think he's going to continue to be a fan favorite. If we use him well I think he could take some hard minutes off the Sedins and Kesler like Malhotra did. Santorelli, Higgins and Kelser has something nice going but I'd be interested to see a Henrik, Kesler, Santorelli, 1-2-3 combo down the middle. I think we could get the most out of our wingers that way.
23 teams in the league allow fewer than 3 goals per game so yes if you score 3 goals you win.
This is a true statement about virtually every single team/goaltender in the league.
Of course 29 teams also score at least 2 goals per game so in general if you don't score 3 you are probably going to lose.
I wish our record in games where we score 2 was better but for that we'd probably need Luongo to be more than "steady" and probably a few other things to change as well.
All of that being said, I am totally happy with the W and don't care about a last minute, mean nothing goal against. Luongo's numbers are improving as the first month disappears in the rearview mirror and I'm happy to wait until at least the halfway point to start drawing conclusions from his numbers.
Agree that we would need a few other things to change. But Luongo has been more than steady. A .918 save percentage. I don't have the stats for the last stretch but it has steadily climbed up to be in the upper half of goalies. Luongo doesn't need to improve. He just needs to keep playing like he has and this team will continue to climb up the standings.
23 teams in the league allow fewer than 3 goals per game so yes if you score 3 goals you win.
This is a true statement about virtually every single team/goaltender in the league.
I don't really see anyone complaining about Luongo in this thread... Just people complaining about the people potentially complaining about Luongo...
Luongo needed to be better, he recieved critism and a wake-up call from the coach and the fans. He's playing better and low and behold the team is winning. It's no surprise, this is what we need from him, game in and game out. As long as he provides that, there are no problems with him.
I don't really see anyone complaining about Luongo in this thread... Just people complaining about the people potentially complaining about Luongo...
Luongo needed to be better, he recieved critism and a wake-up call from the coach and the fans. He's playing better and low and behold the team is winning. It's no surprise, this is what we need from him, game in and game out. As long as he provides that, there are no problems with him.