Finkle is Einhorn
Registered User
They've sat back for a good chunk of the game. Starting in the 2nd. "High percentage" hockey... Yeah.
At least high-percentage hockey makes sense when you're icing a patchwork lineup.
They've sat back for a good chunk of the game. Starting in the 2nd. "High percentage" hockey... Yeah.
If LA has the momentum, what do you think AV can do to change that? Sure he can shuffle the lines and tell the players what he wants, but ultimately it's up to the players to make it happen on the ice.
It's much smarter for AV to keep the Canucks playing safe when LA is turning up the heat at home, rather than tell the players to take risks in an attempt to score another goal.
When I watched a few wolves games this year, connauton looks like he was great at rushing the puck and had lots of speed, could that not help the pp/5v5 breakouts allowing for him to be of more use then a Barker or a ahlberts?
tell me why I'm wrong Tiranis.
Well he was in the 2012 All-Star Game (Western Conference AHL All-Stars) and he has been putting up points as a defense man.
http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/kevin_connauton/
Also I am pretty sure he is way better than Alberts.
Considering they've had trouble with zone entries at the farm the whole year, you likely have a case of selective memory. Connauton's main asset is his big shot. He's below average defensively and he's merely average offensively. His first pass is also at best average, even by AHL standards.
Considering Canucks play even the worst of our D for about 12-13 ES minutes a night, Connauton is simply not a fit. He could easily cost this team a goal or two if he were given that much ES ice-time. Or you're double-shifting other guys which is not ideal either since it's more likely to cause injuries.
That's ignoring that we have to send someone down to fit him in and risk losing them.