Would like to see him given more playing time as well. I thought he played well in the limited minutes he got and they could use his skill higher up the lineup. With his skating and playmaking abilities he could look good alongside Kesler. I wouldn't mind seeing:
Sedin-Sedin-Booth
Higgins-Kesler-Dalpe
Hansen-Santorelli-Weise
Richardson-Welsh-Kassian
Either way they've got to start using their 4th line more to spell the top guys and I think this allows them to do that given the injuries they have right now. Not a fan of Sestito having played every game so far this year.
I don't mind Sestito, but Welsh is there too so why not give him games in his place from time to time? Couldn't hurt.
Yes, Dalpe could provide more. I'd like to see the following line-up, and have Dalpe get some PP time:
Sedin - Sedin - Higgins
Booth - Santorelli - Kesler
Richardson - Dalpe - Weise
Hansen - Welsh - Kassian
My point isn't that the Canucks need to start averaging 3 goals a game. It's that if 20% of the league is currently scoring 3 GF and 0% of teams have ever averaged 1 GA, it's more reasonable to expect that wins should be coming as a result of scoring more than 2 goals per game rather than holding the opposition to fewer than 2 goals over the course of any given season.
That doesn't mean that Luongo's off the hook if he only allows 2, good teams need their goaltending to steal a few games throughout the year. But again, look at the averages, you have to score 3 times more often than your goaltender bails you out.
In games in which the offense has held up their end of the bargain, Luongo has more than held up his. In one out of every three games this year, the offense has needed Luongo to post a shutout in order to win.
Lu hasn't been great, but to me it's pretty clear that the burden of the season so far falls on the offense.
The offense (mostly the PP), is the primary concern. Luongo remains the secondary concern. A secondary concern is still a concern. That's all anyone has said about goaltending.
The bold up there is the key point: You have to score 3 more than your goalie only lets in 1. This is true, evidenced by team GF/GA averages in each season. However, the question is how many times more? And within static percentages, how many times should scoring you 3 G/G get you points, and how many times should 1 G/G get you points? We know for a fact that the team received more points at the 1 G/G threshold last year. Why? Even getting back to that standard has the team in good position, but that isn't happening. Edit: Further discussion on this I think should be carried onto the Lu thread. This game wasn't on Lu (First goal there could be a case, but not the game), and I don't want to make it appear that it is.