Good thing our strong defensive play kind of mitigates the loss in offense from all those injuries up front right? Isn't that what a good coach will provide? (eg., you learn to play better defensively but tough to "learn" to produce more if the skill ain't there).
Obviously the coaching has had some interesting decisions this season, but a few things:
We all know that if AV were to get the team playing defensive hockey like a few years back, this whole board would melt the **** down. But, I also challenge the idea that he even has the horses to do that all that effectively.
It's tough to play strong defensive hockey when you're missing your top two faceoff guys, and they're replaced with call-ups that are well under 50%. The Canucks have one centre in their lineup right now above 50% - Lapierre at 50.5%. In 2010-11, the team's top 4 faceoff-taking centres were all over 50%. Last year, I think Hodgson was the only one below, but you had Sedin, Kesler, Lapierre, Malhotra, and Pahlsson all over 50%. You're giving yourself an uphill climb defensively when you give the other team the puck at the onset of play more than half the time.
Ditto that with the PK. Malhotra played 30+ seconds more per game on the PK than the next forward, and was destroying on the dot. Kesler, obviously is a major PK and faceoff guy for this team as well. Winning a draw on the PK kills 20+ seconds. That's huge.
It's not like the forwards and defense are somehow two totally separate categories. This isn't football.