Lazlo Hollyfeld
The jersey ad still sucks
- Mar 4, 2004
- 28,670
- 27,172
I thought it was Larkin as well.Didn't Larkin **** up, not Cholowski?
I thought it was Larkin as well.Didn't Larkin **** up, not Cholowski?
Mick's commentary can't be trusted.I thought it was Larkin as well.
He's been the best player on the ice so you're picking a bad time to criticize him.And right at the end of the period there, the legendary Athanasiou decisionmaking. 1 on 5? I like those odds
That play is perfectly reasonable to criticize no matter what kind of game a player is having. Decisions like these are a big part of why he's as successful as he is. Read: not veryHe's been the best player on the ice so you're picking a bad time to criticize him.
Even during the intermission recap they're pinning it on Cholowski but it's clearly Larkin behind the net with the puck.Mick's commentary can't be trusted.
I was referring more to his "legendary decisionmaking." That's going beyond that one play.That play is perfectly reasonable to criticize no matter what kind of game a player is having. Decisions like these are a big part of why he's as successful as he is. Read: not very
LolOur best player. If Larkin does get the C he should get the A. And if he keeps it up he could be considered for the C!
Were you following Red Wings hockey before this season? I question if you have any idea what you're talking about. Like clearly you have just discovered this Andreas Athanasiou fellow, so maybe you should read about his career before this season and catch up a bit.Not very? He has 6 goals this month and has been one of the Wings best players. Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
This post is so obtuse I'm not sure if you're actually being serious or emulating a character from the Simpsons.Were you following Red Wings hockey before this season? I question if you have any idea what you're talking about. Like clearly you have just discovered this Andreas Athanasiou fellow, so maybe you should read about his career before this season and catch up a bit.
I'm with you, my brother.One more period here guys, Let Buffalo do what Washington did to us in the 3rd. Score 2 goals and shut us down.
Surely you'd agree that to make an assessment of one's decisionmaking, you need to look at how their decisionmaking has been in the past? And if one has made a lot of poor decisions in the past and makes a poor decision in the present, it may be appropriate to say, "there's that poor decisionmaking again!"This post is so obtuse I'm not sure if you're actually being serious or emulating a character from the Simpsons.
Yes, I've been watching hockey since the 80s. Typically when I talk about a player's success I'm referring to their play during the current season rather than omitting their current play and only focusing on their questionable plays in the past.
No need to try and misdirect.Surely you'd agree that to make an assessment of one's decisionmaking, you need to look at how their decisionmaking has been in the past? And if one has made a lot of poor decisions in the past and makes a poor decision in the present, it may be appropriate to say, "there's that poor decisionmaking again!"
Even Larkin should be able to crack 30 as well. 30-50-80 guy maybe?AA is getting 30+ this year barring injury