Sorry, I didn't mean for it to be an indictment on your post history, it's more about attitudes about him as a whole after 2 games.
I don't think Chiarot has been great by any means but he certainly hasn't been as bad as people want to make him out to be. He hasn't been bench worthy bad, if anything the two weakest links have been Ghost and Petry, I think Maatta struggled more than both Holl and Chiarot last night but I'm more forgiving that it was his first game playing with a bunch of new people in a rotation and not indicative of his play every night.
I don't want to be a Chiarot stan I just hate seeing reality being warped in the form of confirmation bias. If he f***s up, and he will and does it plenty, it's earned and I feel he f***s up enough that we don't need to create scenarios where he f***ed up when he didn't. I appreciate your response.