DitClapper
Registered User
- May 15, 2014
- 7,896
- 348
Maybe Loui can be the John Lackey of the Bruins.
I'm thinking more of a Danny Amendola.
Maybe Loui can be the John Lackey of the Bruins.
watched Lauzon and team QMJHL beat the Russian team (ho hum 3 pt night and strong 3 zone play from Lauzon)
Nice to see our boys collect 2 pts
team looked much better without K. Miller, no one saw that coming... Hopefully they keep these guys together for a few games and we can get on a roll. I like Trotman next to Chara a lot and hopefully he gets more comfortable there as the year goes on.
watched Lauzon and team QMJHL beat the Russian team (ho hum 3 pt night and strong 3 zone play from Lauzon)
Nice to see our boys collect 2 pts
As much as it sucks to have some fans hate on our favorite players... the concept of trading high is valid (if a trade is warranted in the first place).
Even folks in Minneapolis took their hats off for King Loui III:
Generally true, except for some reason it only applies to certain players. Can't trade Chara, Bergeron, Rask or Krejci, you know?
I get that trading high v low is a valid concept. Where it doesn't make sense is when the player to be traded is contributing to the success of the team. It degrades the team unless the returning player can jump right in and contribute to the same degree as the outgoing player, which is unlikely.
The only reason to move Eriksson right now would be due to a complete rebuild. And if that's the case, then perhaps you also move Chara, Rask and Krejci because, you know, complete rebuild.
Frankly, I would probably never move Bergeron. He's the true captain, the heart and soul of this club. Yeah, yeah, I know...what if I could get Stamkos and Sequin and Kane and Toews and every other top notch player in return? I'll go ahead and say sure only because it'll never happen like that.
What's the value of a 25 goal scorer at the deadline ? Thats the question, I still think they will move him and not resign him. Hope he keeps this up in a contract year and he cashes in just not here.
I can't see trading Eriksson. He is one of the best if not the best forward on this team.
Nobody knows what the situation at the trade deadline is going to be, teams might be more in need of defensemen than wingers. If that is the case the Bruins won't get that much for him. It is possible that there will be a strong need for wingers but even then the probability of the Bruins landing a high draft pick in return for him is uncertain at best. And IMO that is what they would have to get back to justify trading him, based on his play this season.
Loui Ertrickson
The guy has been an absolute stud the past two seasons. Lots of people got on his case for not producing as offensively as advertised, however, when he wasn't producing on the score sheet he was always doing the little things right. He wasn't like a Lucic, who would produce for 3 games, then take 5 games off and be absolutely invisible. Loui was always visible on the ice, imo.
Glad he's finally being rewarded offensively. He's a key part of this team, I'd even make the argument that he's our 3rd most important forward behind Bergeron & Krejci.
KING LOUI.
Also, Tyler Randell. I love that guy... i'm still laughing at how pissed he was at Carter last night. I legit thought he was going to rip his head off his shoulders and punt it into the 14th row.