Fistfullofbeer
Moderator
This team has a chance to be special. With a little more time together I think they can make the playoffs this year.
Agreed. I’ve liked everyone else in the top six except Eberle tonight.
Vegas is a fast team, but those 3 on 2 opportunities for Vegas were inexcusable. What was Sheahan doing on the first goal?Though, we need to tighten up a bit more and try to be more balanced cause giving up all those 3vs2 rushes will get you beaten a lot in the NHL:
Vegas is a fast team, but those 3 on 2 opportunities for Vegas were inexcusable. What was Sheahan doing on the first goal?
BTW, I changed my username. I will be completing my transition to a Kraken fan within the next 2 weeks with a new avatar.
Vegas is a fast team, but those 3 on 2 opportunities for Vegas were inexcusable. What was Sheahan doing on the first goal?
BTW, I changed my username. I will be completing my transition to a Kraken fan within the next 2 weeks with a new avatar.
Eberle should be a 2nd line wing with someone else creating for him. When placed in a primary role like he will be this season it's going to be very frustrating. He's all hands and no body. He's going to score an impressive goal or two, but when he's not scoring he's not adding much to the team. Not big hit. No real forecheck. Etc.
on the 4th goal, was it a clear kicking motion like he moves his skate towards the net kicking the puck in the process putting the puck in the net. Its a very very subjective call when its not clearly obvious and i mean obvious. Like you are going to kick a soccer ball obvious. What happens after skate touches the puck doesn't matter. It maters what does the player do with his skate before it touches the puck that's where it matters. Again does he go to move the skate in a motion like you were gonna kick something before touching the puck?
Stephenson clearly takes his weight off his skate and flicks the puck with it into the net. For decades this would have been waived off, but ever since they changed the rule to allow redirections with the skate instead of just a carom, they have gotten really loose with these calls. After I saw the replay, I knew they wouldn't overturn it, just based on precedence, but that does not in any way change the fact that it was kicked in.
Tough break.
It's always been with interpretation of the rule.Sounds like the issue is more to do with the rule than the call itself.
It's always been with interpretation of the rule.
The rule now says that you can "pivot your skate to redirect a puck" where it used to be, "you can not move your skate at all so the puck just has to bounce off of it".
The spirit of the rule was that you can twist your foot to change the bank angle to redirect it, but ever since they took the replay decision away from the refs to speed up the process and set up their review department in Toronto, they have allowed players to use their skates like pinball flippers to kick in goals. Hell, since the rule change, I have seen some goals allowed where there is no way you can argue they weren't kicked in, and even the special consultant guys on the broadcast from the rule committee and the announcers are dumbfounded when they are upheld.
The rule change came in when league scoring was down, and I think that influenced how they initially ruled it on the replays in Toronto, and it has just sorta set a precedence. It's lame, but it is what it is.
I'm more concern of why was the player allowed to be in that position in the first place than the goal itself. Sounds like Seattle's Defense was kinda lacking at times.
Blues fan here.Yeah that was a heck of a game against a “cup favorite”. We lost on a bs call in my opinion, that was a deliberate kick motion but w/e. Long season ahead like what I saw so far from the team. Granted they aren’t gonna have that intensity for 82 games but we’ll find our rhythm. Dunn was really bad though….