Proposal: Gallagher for Ovechkin, would you do it?

[LastChancePrice]

Last night me and my friend were talking about hockey, and we both came inot this subject about if the trade proposal of Gallagher for Ovechkin would happen, we got different opinion.

I personally would never do that trade. I think Gallagher give more to this team than Ovechkin would. Sure we are talking about a 50 goals scorer, but finishing at -35 show that hes not giving his team a chance of winning. He think on his side that a player like Ovechkin could be more valuable because of all the goals he can score.

So, what do you think, would you do the trade?

Click to read more...

 

[Kairi Zaide]

Compute time : 0.021s
Output : yes

 

[Estimated_Prophet]

I would do it in a heart beat.....then I would turn around and Flip Ovechkin for a huge package.

 

[the]

I would take Ovechkin any day!

 

[V13]

As much as i love Gallagher it would be extremely dumb not to

Ovechkin >>>>>>>>> Gallagher

 

[Le Barron de HF]

What is this stupid question

 

[Frozenice]

Thank you for posting this here and not on the main board, or so I hope.

 

[dkd]

Compute time : 0.021s
Output : yes

Too much CS.

 

[snakeye]

What's Ovechkin's contract like again?

 

[Lafleurs Guy]

In before lock...

 

[SH8WTIME]

Please tell me this is a joke. +/- is so overrated. If Ovechkin scores 4 pp goals in a game and is on the ice for one of the other team goal, he finishes the game -1 even if he is the reason is team wins 4-1. I would give 3 Gallagher to have have Ovy in my team. We are taking about the best (or one of the best) sniper in the NHL.

 

[Nico Cauzuki]

Last night me and my friend were talking about hockey, and we both came inot this subject about if the trade proposal of Gallagher for Ovechkin would happen, we got different opinion.

I personally would never do that trade. I think Gallagher give more to this team than Ovechkin would. Sure we are talking about a 50 goals scorer, but finishing at -35 show that hes not giving his team a chance of winning. He think on his side that a player like Ovechkin could be more valuable because of all the goals he can score.

So, what do you think, would you do the trade?

say whaaaaaaat ?

 

[Alexdaman]

/thread

 

[CHarlie]

Is this even necessary..........uhhhhhggggg

 

[Alexdaman]

 

[JohnLennon]

Ovechkin is an all-star with the arguably best scoring touch in the league, and Gallagher isn't. It's as simple as that.

 

[CaptainBenn]

Lol is that a joke...
if Gallagher ever gets seriously injured (I hope he wont) people on this board will be the first ones to call him a smurf/useless a la Desharnais

 

[BLONG7]

Last night me and my friend were talking about hockey, and we both came inot this subject about if the trade proposal of Gallagher for Ovechkin would happen, we got different opinion.

I personally would never do that trade. I think Gallagher give more to this team than Ovechkin would. Sure we are talking about a 50 goals scorer, but finishing at -35 show that hes not giving his team a chance of winning. He think on his side that a player like Ovechkin could be more valuable because of all the goals he can score.

So, what do you think, would you do the trade?

Do not go to the main board with this one...k

 

[Alexdaman]

Hey poster! would you trade Bournival for Giroux!

 

[S Bah]

No thanks, Ovechkin would be the worst disruptive player to team chemistry we could unleash on our team! Hell no!

 

[CaptainBenn]

Hey poster! would you trade Bournival for Giroux!

No

 

[Et le But]

Yes, without a second thought. I'd feel sad about it though.

Ovechkin has a legion of flaws, he's also the best goalscorer in hockey by a considerable margin, and a generational talent. He also wouldn't be the captain and the source of all hope the way he is in Washington.

Look at how someone like Vanek was able to improve our offense, imagine what Ovechkin would do.

 

[ourobouros]

huh?

 

[Blind Gardien]

Well, Ovechkin's contract would at least give me pause enough to check into his status first, dispel any KHL rumours, interview him and get a sense of his commitment level to the Habs. It's not exactly a slam dunk that you take on $70M without doing at least a little homework first. The player value isn't the point; there's a certain level of due diligence that ought to be considered unavoidable.

 

[Alexdaman]

No

Youre right his character and energy brings so much to this team than a 80pts+ scoring leaders.