He gave up 13 draft slots, and while the cap hit was just under 900k less, there were also 2 years and more money remaining.
That would have been a much better option than a buyout.
Confirmed with Link: G Ilya Samsonov heads to arbitration (Awarded 1 year, $3.55M)
- Thread starter Divine
- Start date
That would have been a much better option than a buyout.
Peasy
Registered User
Its too bad Chicago already has a bum goalie to help them tank... I wonder who provided them with that.
The only thing that matters in the nhl is cap hit. Obviously you're too biased to understand that.
He gave up a first no matter what way you want to spin it. He was the King at giving up firsts for no reason it partially why we had1 of his draft picks playing for on the playoff roster 4 years into his GM career
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,812
- 39,344
That's the other poster, it's easy to get them mixed up.
Divine
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2010
- 18,368
- 12,131
Toronto Maple Leafs Daily - MapleLeafsDaily.com
www.mapleleafsinsider.com
This is the kind of expert analysis we've come to expect with TSN.
That's not only not true, but Mrazek's contract carried more remaining charge against the cap anyway. There was 7.6m in remaining cap hit, spread out over 2 years, compared to 4.68m for Murray. I'm not sure how one could think that remaining term means nothing. If we're going to move on from Murray, I would have much preferred dropping 13 spots in the draft than have cap charges from a buyout. Heck, even in this hypothetical where cap hit is all that mattered, retaining 880k and dropping 13 draft slots would have been better.
And he got back an early 2nd, 13 draft slots lower.
SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 52,128
- 33,497
Welp seems like they ramrodded him into the LTIR
Massive win for the leafs
Still 2 mill ( and a little over with 20 players) over so I assume we have more work to do.
Lafferty, Timmins, jarnkrok and possibly Brodie ( if we can find someone to do his job) are ones that might be pieces they're looking to move I would guess
Massive win for the leafs
Still 2 mill ( and a little over with 20 players) over so I assume we have more work to do.
Lafferty, Timmins, jarnkrok and possibly Brodie ( if we can find someone to do his job) are ones that might be pieces they're looking to move I would guess
Awesome right? Just when you thought Robidas Island was shut down, please forgive me.
kb
Registered User
- Aug 28, 2009
- 15,283
- 21,720
Oh you mean the 13 positions that the Leafs dropped to move Mrazek with more term and actual moneys owed?
How about telling the whole truth, and not your fantasy version. So odd how the takes are on the premise that the whole world forgot what happened just last season. Traded pick #25 and Mrazek for pick #38.
We traded a first for less cap space then aquired a third to take up more cap space.
Even by your spin Dubas took a massive L on this because he didn't get the same value that he gave up while taking on a worse contract with more real money owed in the final year. Not to mention with Murray he was negotiating with all the leverage
Dude goy body bagged repeatedly it's ok to admit it.
Larcos_Unal
Excuses are for losers
Can't believe some of you clowns are still on here defending Dubas even after he used his expert negotiating skills to get his own ass fired.
Racer88
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2020
- 10,585
- 10,329
It blows my mind that there are still a few fans defending a GM that managed basically nothing and only 1 round win in his 5 years
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 73,812
- 39,344
I’ve come to the belief that it’s really one with multiple accounts.
Racer88
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2020
- 10,585
- 10,329
It sometimes seems like that but for the life of me I can’t understand why someone would expend that much energy.
Or they could move 0 of those pieces and send Robertson, Gambrell and Holmberg to the AHL
No fans are doing that, the people doing that are ass kissers
A1LeafNation
Obsession beats talent everytime!!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,406
- 17,353
Samsonov 3.55m for 1 year and Gustavsson at 3.75m for 3 years.
Massive L for Treliving/Shanahan.
Massive L for Treliving/Shanahan.
Not really, it’s a pretty big gamble on Minnesota’s end. Gustavsson’s record aside from last season is very mediocre in the AHL and NHL.
A1LeafNation
Obsession beats talent everytime!!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,406
- 17,353
Same as Samsonov. Rather have Gustavssons deal than Sammy's right now.
Last edited:
Buds17
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2015
- 8,248
- 3,369
Bigger risk and reward associated with Gustavsson's contract. While he could very well maintain or improve upon last season's performance, he'll still be competing with MAF for playing time during the first season of that deal. Woll has the less certain present but possibly brighter future in comparison as a secondary option in goal.
acrobaticgoalie
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2014
- 3,357
- 3,391
I might be wrong but I think I heard that Samsonov was only eligible for a 1 yr contract through arbitration
Mirtle: What we're hearing about the Maple Leafs cap situation and summer moves
How did Matt Murray end up on LTIR? How do the Maple Leafs get cap compliant before the season?
theathletic.com
Will Ilya Samsonov be bitter after arbitration?
As for Samsonov, while I was a little surprised the case reached arbitration, the number they ended up landing on — $3.55 million for one year — was totally reasonable.
The Leafs didn’t need to go through a full arbitration hearing in order to activate the second buyout window, so we can throw that out as a theory for why they went through with it. But I suspect they wanted to get his number a little lower than $3.55 million to give them some more cap wiggle room, as you’ll see in my calculations further down in this post.
The one downside to having an arbitration hearing in order to try and squeeze a key player, like your starting goalie, is the cases can create bad blood between player and team.
...........
I talked to some folks who were involved in the Samsonov process, and they spoke highly of how Treliving handled the situation as a new GM coming in who doesn’t have a relationship with the player.
There was “nothing out of bounds,” said a source with knowledge of how the arbitration hearing went. “And Brad is very professional.”
Both sides, to my understanding, were fine with the ultimate award.
What prevented the Leafs from getting a longer-term deal done? Well, every year beyond the first one was going to be a UFA season for Samsonov. And given he’s coming off a big year, and will be the Leafs No. 1 to start 2023-24, those UFA years could get expensive.
The Leafs were likely looking at a $4.25 million cap hit on a two-year deal, $4.5 million on a three-year deal, and numbers that went up from there the longer the contract was.
All this for a goaltender who has started just 119 regular-season games.
As a result, short term makes a lot of sense. But if Samsonov has another season like last year, his cap hit is going to start with a five the next time around.
ULF_55
Moderator
Mirtle: What we're hearing about the Maple Leafs cap situation and summer moves
How did Matt Murray end up on LTIR? How do the Maple Leafs get cap compliant before the season?
Will Ilya Samsonov be bitter after arbitration?
As for Samsonov, while I was a little surprised the case reached arbitration, the number they ended up landing on — $3.55 million for one year — was totally reasonable.
The Leafs didn’t need to go through a full arbitration hearing in order to activate the second buyout window, so we can throw that out as a theory for why they went through with it. But I suspect they wanted to get his number a little lower than $3.55 million to give them some more cap wiggle room, as you’ll see in my calculations further down in this post.
All this for a goaltender who has started just 119 regular-season games.
As a result, short term makes a lot of sense. But if Samsonov has another season like last year, his cap hit is going to start with a five the next time around.
For comparison
Boston Bruins G Jeremy Swayman awarded one-year, $3.475M contract in arbitration | TSN
Boston Bruins goaltender Jeremy Swayman has been awarded a one-year, $3.475 million contract in arbitration, according to multiple reports. Swayman entered his hearing with the Bruins on Sunday, becoming the third player to reach arbitration this summer.
www.tsn.ca
Swayman, 24, finished his second full NHL season with a 24-6-4 record with a .920 save percentage and 2.27 goals-against average while sharing the net with 2023 Vezina Trophy winner Linus Ullmark. The duo shared the William M. Jennings Trophy after allowing a league-low 177 goals against in 2022-2023.
Jimmy Firecracker
Fire Sheldon.
For comparison
Boston Bruins G Jeremy Swayman awarded one-year, $3.475M contract in arbitration | TSN
Boston Bruins goaltender Jeremy Swayman has been awarded a one-year, $3.475 million contract in arbitration, according to multiple reports. Swayman entered his hearing with the Bruins on Sunday, becoming the third player to reach arbitration this summer.
Swayman, 24, finished his second full NHL season with a 24-6-4 record with a .920 save percentage and 2.27 goals-against average while sharing the net with 2023 Vezina Trophy winner Linus Ullmark. The duo shared the William M. Jennings Trophy after allowing a league-low 177 goals against in 2022-2023.
f*** off. How does a Jennings winner get less than Sammy?
Because Boston's defense was just that much better than everyone else's. Sorry man that's all I got
