Where did I say untouchable? I'd like you to quote where I've said he's untouchable at any point in this discussion because I'm fairly sure I've never actually written that
I've said that if he is this player trading him would be a massive mistake since he's exactly what were looking for he just doesn't shoot right
The 23 year old has developed into a player that can take more responsibility and minutes, is that a surprising turn of events for a young developing player? Was he supposed to stagnate forever and never become a top 4 option? Is this not what some development curves look like?
So were risk adverse now? Bringing in Ceci to play with him wasn't a risk? Barrie wasn't a risk? Neither of those trades have worked and I know that currently Dermott is on a shutdown pair against a high QOC in the top 4 and already in house, sure he's a risk but a trade isn't?
I'm getting tired of this mystical RD that's riding in on his white horse to save the day after a decade of not being able to trade for one, my plan is in house and realistic not "in an ideal world"
So he may fail? Like the trade for a top pair RD plan for the last decade? That type of failure or worse you think?
You never said it, I just felt like it was implied by what you were saying.
I would agree with your second statement, the most important part being 'if he stays this way'. That is a big if and even more so if he is asked to play his offside on the top pairing.
We dont know if he developed into this player from now on or if this is a blip. That is what I'm saying, the sample size of his good play in the 4D is too small to bank on him playing top pairing in the future.
Ceci was a calculated risk as management thought he was better than Zaitsev who he was traded for. I would tend to agree. Barrie was a mistake and a perfect example of why it is very important of looking at the context a player thrived in and seeing if your able to reproduce it on your own team. Leafs never were going to be able to put him in that position. Just a bad fit from day 1.
I would say yes, it is too big a risk to expect him to play top pairing right defense next year. Not enough evidence of strong play in the top 4D or the right side yet. I think there is a decent chance the leafs may try it still as the prices may too high for trades and they will want to manage cap which Dermott, Holl and Lily would do on the right side.
What the leafs cant do is pay Dermott like a top4D, that would be a big mistake.