Panthaz89
Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
For my team it was good. The guy is a med elite 84 at 20 years old though the 3 prospects could be pretty good but the Sabres already have the Rasmus pair so I dont have to worry.Was it worth it?
For my team it was good. The guy is a med elite 84 at 20 years old though the 3 prospects could be pretty good but the Sabres already have the Rasmus pair so I dont have to worry.Was it worth it?
Unfortunately I don't. Each person gets something different out of gaming. I just play the game as it is and enjoy it more for the fantasy aspect. Sometimes I will play on hard but I don't impose any rules.Does anyone have any "rules" they place on themselves in franchise mode to make it more realistic? IE only doing deals that match trade blocks, hard trade difficulty, Only do deals with teams who ask you about a player? etc etc. I'm trying to make my franchise mode feel more "real". Please let me know any tips, tricks, or rules you like to set for yourself to make it feel "real".
Does anyone have any "rules" they place on themselves in franchise mode to make it more realistic? IE only doing deals that match trade blocks, hard trade difficulty, Only do deals with teams who ask you about a player? etc etc. I'm trying to make my franchise mode feel more "real". Please let me know any tips, tricks, or rules you like to set for yourself to make it feel "real".
A great foundation you have given me here. I appreciate that! Yeah, I have been trying to implement some of this other aspects though I haven't thought of. Thanks for the ideas! If anyone else has any rules of more realism please share them! Love to hear all of your guys tricks.Well, I don’t necessarily follow all these myself all the time (probably will do a strict, realistic one, one day), but here’s some you could use...
In general. If what you’re doing feels like you’re manipulating the AI, then don’t do it.
- Unless they’re depth players/middling or worse prospects, don’t trade for them unless their team wants to trade them.
- If you’re rebuilding and want to trade away players for picks, limit it to two or three. Moreso ones with a year left in their contract. And only to teams that want them.
- Don’t offer free agents unreasonable contracts. Don’t overpay significantly or go more than a year away from their desired length of contract.
- Same with re-signing players. Understand when a player seems to want a bridge contract or a long term one.
- Don’t offer sheet players for cheap just because the cpu mismanaged their cap and cant sign them.
- Limit trades in the draft to a few trades. Don’t trade unless they’re willing to give up the pick.
- Don’t try to trade for a pick to get every good steal you find in the draft. Reach for players in later rounds, as most teams have wildly different player rankings at that point
- Don’t trade players that you just signed. Probably not for a year, at least
- When you do make a trade, don’t just throw in random players or picks to up the value. Especially highly valued prospects that may or may not work out. Make sure most of the value given is from assets they want
- If you want to really match reality. Do an overview of their roster and check of the player actually make sense, or if it just happens to match a too vague trade block desire
- Don’t trade aging veterans to rebuilding teams. Don’t trade picks and young players not ready for the NHL to teams that are going for the cup now (in exchange for players)
Potentials have a ceiling and a likelihoodThere seem to be a lot of "Elites" in franchise mode it kind of feels unrealistic. I'm not sure how these elites pan out. Is there like a percentage chance they can be duds? I just watched a video of a youtuber named mattwicc he just got like 5-6 elite players in rounds 1-5. It feels kind of weird.
How exactly do the elites in this or past games really work? Do they all become something?
Yeah, there seems to be some separation. It seems like you can kind of "game" the system but putting them in the AHL sooner. I just wish the odds of them becoming elite were lower. I wish we saw more High Top 6 forwards who could flop as bottom 6 or even become elites. Is there a video explaining the differences and probabilities. I really seem to be missing something here. I've had some elites turn out great. I really haven't had many duds in my experience to this point.Potentials have a ceiling and a likelihood
Elite is a ceiling. Low, medium, or high is the probability they reach that potential
You’re probably seeing a lot of low elites
FYI, there a potential called Franchise above that
Top 6 F/Top 4 D medium is almost always better than low elite...they rarely ever become valuable players. Guys who are already 70ish at 18 years old should be a safe bet though.Yeah, there seems to be some separation. It seems like you can kind of "game" the system but putting them in the AHL sooner. I just wish the odds of them becoming elite were lower. I wish we saw more High Top 6 forwards who could flop as bottom 6 or even become elites. Is there a video explaining the differences and probabilities. I really seem to be missing something here. I've had some elites turn out great. I really haven't had many duds in my experience to this point.
Some person posted a guide to the ratings previously. He said essentially a "low elite or top 6" it has the potential to be 2 ranks above or below. Which would be a low top 6 could become a franchise guy. It Is that really a thing?
Gems tend to be players with low current stats, but the scouts believe they’ll develop well over time.Can anyone help me with how "gem" prospects work?
An A+ scout identified a "gem" in the third round: a 6'3 LHD enforcer who has no strengths, 3 significant weaknesses, poor stats across the board. Everything that could be negative, is negative, except for his player comparison, which is Chara. All of these traits are given the accurate rating as well. I dont know what to believe here, it seems like he's giving me a **** sandwich and calling it caviar.
Gems tend to be players with low current stats, but the scouts believe they’ll develop well over time.
Only guessing at if this is technically how it works, but it seems like gems will tend to grow into at least serviceable players or even meet their potential.
Though your scours certainly can miss others. So those probably aren’t all the gems available either.
No idea if they can be mistaken on them, though
I’ve gotten messages back saying that my valuation of players is way off compared to what their scouts are sayingIs anyone else finding trading unreasonably difficult?
I'm not saying it should be easy, but I'm offering some of these players they identify that they want, exactly meeting their trade block needs in a fair deal (I'm not low balling them) and they'll reject it saying they can live with it, but my guy's are overvalued? But again it's a deal that by all indications meets their trade block, and even they say it meets their needs, etc.
This is correct from what I understand. With Fog of War on, it also affects how other teams view certain players. They could over or under value either their own or your players. I've seen some CPU trades that made no sense, and this is the reason why.I’ve gotten messages back saying that my valuation of players is way off compared to what their scouts are saying
Which basically means theyre seeing a different set of trade values than you.
I’ve no idea if EA has every team running their own fog of war where they could be getting your players’ values wrong, but they can definitely see a different set of values than you do
That does make it clear that there is one way fog of war could definitely improveThis is correct from what I understand. With Fog of War on, it also affects how other teams view certain players. They could over or under value either their own or your players. I've seen some CPU trades that made no sense, and this is the reason why.
Not sure if it's going to be a good thing or a bad thing. I ultimately think it's just going to be super annoying because it will be random. Usually in real life, when there is a bad trade, there are usually reasons for it. Whether it be cap issues, desperately wanting to win now, or an issue with the player/club.
I wish EA would design preseason in franchise mode so that you can have unlimited players on your roster, as you can in real life. I'd like to be able to experiment with a bunch of young players and AHL players. Instead, I have to send a bunch of vets down to the minors in order to experiment with other players
yeah had this issue a lotIs anyone else finding trading unreasonably difficult?
I'm not saying it should be easy, but I'm offering some of these players they identify that they want, exactly meeting their trade block needs in a fair deal (I'm not low balling them) and they'll reject it saying they can live with it, but my guy's are overvalued? But again it's a deal that by all indications meets their trade block, and even they say it meets their needs, etc.