Yea... No..
Besides his obvious scoring touch, the best thing about Kessel is actually his contract. It might not feel like it right now but in 2 years $8M will feel like rent control. In the coming years Stamkos, Tavares, Benn will all be making $11M-$12M each. We would have by far the best core and core-per-$.
Yea... No..
One thing people are ignoring:
Let's say the Leafs keep Kessel. Let's say scoring rebounds, but Kessel, on the bad Leafs, scores 60 again. Does his value drop?
A year older, does his value drop?
Th Leafs lose, despite rebuilding. Does his value, in the ridiculous NHL, drop?
He finally gets hurt. Does his value drop?
There are far more permutations where Kessel's value drops by holding him than scenarios where the Leafs get more value for holding on to him.
He's going to be moved. The Pens are the only team actively trying to get him. Be patient.
don't trade the kids
Is it safe to assume Hunter is pushing hard for Maatta and that is what's holding this deal up? Or is it something ridiculous like they want both DP and Maatta?
Im off the Kessel train. Im sure there are other options that hasne even been mentioned in the media.
What if we try to get a young forward who has yet to break out. Worst case is we have a good option for the 3rd line. Best case is that said player breaks out big time and we win the trade by far.
I took in this article and http://thehockeywriters.com/updated-status-of-penguins-top-free-agents/
Any updates Ros... er I mean IC?
I was all geared up for a move yesterday and now im very interested in how this shakes out.
Nothing is going to happen this weekend. Everyone is taking a step back and letting the other side marinade. Shanahan need to move him. The league knows this. JR desperately wants him. Shanahan knows this. At this point, it comes down to Toronto either saying, "we're getting two great assets, an ok asset, and a dump for our best player, let's call it a day" or Pittsburgh saying, "I'm tired of waiting, take what you want."
Or both sides walking away.
So why would we give all that up for Kessel? Last time I checked he was only 1 long term player.....even if he can eat like 2!
So it has to be Pouliot, 1st 2016, Sutter and Scuds....
We have kids to play defense and the bottom 6. Those holes can all be adequately filled from within. But we don't have kids ready to play in the top 6. That is something we actually do need.
Because Kessel is a better player than Saad and is signed long term. Saad may only want a bridge deal at 5 mil then get paid 8 in a few years if he's really as good as people think.
They want Maatta. It's not for both.
I will say, I don't know if Rossi's rumoured packers is true, but if so, I'm shocked they turned it down. They aren't getting any other offers, and if they **** around too much, they're going to lose their only chance to move him.
I do think there some truth to the "joke" that teams are waiting for JR to go full Despres trade. The key is just to wait it out. I do think Fitzgerald talked some sense into the group.
I think we are on the same page as far as playing young players. I guess the biggest thing for me is that I want to keep Pouliot and would rather trade Kapanen if we are acquiring Kessel. Pouliot is NHL ready now and has a spot on our team which would have to be replaced now and for the future. Kapanen likely needs a year in WBS and his future is more clouded. Pouliot has more upside IMO and is more valuable to the organization, especially with Letangs health being a concern. I know we need wingers in our system, but I think Kapanen is more expendable than Pouliot. Would rather Kapanen + 1st than Pouliot.
Still don't see the problem. So if he is that good, we pay him the same as Kessel, and he is younger and doesn't carry Kessel's baggage......don't see the issue if the packages we give up are identical.