Losing Balcers for nothing was definitely not part of the plan. Dorion obviously thought he’d clear. Bad move. How many non goalies have been claimed off waivers this year ?
EDIT: 4 D have been claimed. Balcers is the only forward claimed off waivers this year. Bad luck.
I don't know but what I know is the Senators don't nearly have the depht that Dorion intended to have going into the season. Not a team that can afford to lose players for nothing at this point in time. Sure, there was a lot of players waived so it was likely they wouldn't lose all 3 but putting Balcers, Jaros and Chlapik meant we were most likely to lose at least one. Balcers got claimed, Jaros got acquired via trade and the same could easily happen with Chlapik. It seems other NHL teams do have some interet in these players because they're young, cheap and could play well for them.
We already lost a lot of players from last year (Pageau, Duclair, Ennis, Namestnikov, Ryan, DeMelo, Hainsey, Borowiecki). Murray instead of Andy is a good move, Dadonov is also a nice move but it seems that we are missing 2 more solid veterans (1 forward and 1 D-man)
Stutzle vs Duclair
Norris vs Pageau
Batherson vs Ennis
Dadonov vs Ryan
Watson vs Sabourin/Beaudin/Boedker
Stepan vs Namestnikov
Zub vs DeMelo
Gudbranson vs Hainsey
Wolanin/Brannstrom vs Borowiecki
The thing is it doesn't even look that bad on paper. Sure Stutzle/Norris/Batherson are quite young and inexperienced but they are going to be much better than those 3 in the near future. Ryan barely played last year and had issues, Dadonov is a bit younger and a good upgrade. Watson is also a clear upgrade, Zub could also be an upgrade in the near future. It's basically just Stepan who is a downgrade.
That damn North division certainly plays a big role in the team underperfoming and I think coaching is also a MAJOR reason why they are struggling overall. The team has a lot of trouble figuring out defensive systems (if there is) and the line combinations and PP strategies are clearly not working most of the time.
The intentions were good but bringing too many marginal vets didn't help. They were already stuck with Anisimov contract, and it turns out that Stepan, Paquette, Galchenyuk, Josh Brown, Coburn dragged the team down more than anything.
At least it seems that they want to correct these mistakes sooner than later.
I know what he meant, but said poster also implied that any goalie who comes in the game in relief of the starter is destined to have a bad game. I have watched many games where the starting goalie gets pulled and the goalie coming off the bench ends up having a good game the rest of the way, it is not unprecedented or anything.
No, it doesn't mean the goalie will have a bad game. The problem is when the goalie comes "in cold" in a game where his team is clearly outmatched.