I'm not going to bother reading, but not sure how he can list previous cup winners as an example when every one of them has been "top heavy"
He is 27, he has a long time to get his ring or two. And he most likely will.
Kris Letang had 54 points, tied for No. 71 among NHL players; Patric Hornqvist’s 51 were good for 85th. Along with Crosby and Malkin, those four were the only Penguins to post more than 40 points. No other Eastern Conference playoff team had fewer than six players above the 40-point line.
When I got to the following paragraph I wondered if the author would ever acknowledge the sheer number of injuries the Pens had to deal with last season:
As it turns out, there is never a single mention of injuries in the entire article. It seems odd that the author would reference Crosby's and Malkin's points per game in the immediately preceding paragraph, but then only reference total points for any other player (including mentioning where Letang and Hornqvist ranked in total points, but not in points per game...)
Seems awfully strange to choose different stats for comparison in those two cases... and "coincidentally" the ones that make the Pens look worse.
Edit:
For the record, Hornqvist moves up to 45th based on pts/g, and Letang is at 50th.
The Pens also had 8 players on pace for over 40 points, but injuries kept them lower than that...
Saying the Pens don't need a top end winger because of Crosby and Malkin having high ppg....is not watching games, but only looking at statlines. This team had issues lacking both high caliber scoring wings AND depth. Scoring has been a big problem in recent playoffs. Phil will help tremendously in that department. With the cap increasing, Phil's addition makes the Pens better in the top and bottom 6, as it should push some fringe top 6 guys into the bottom 6.
Defense is going to be a question mark, but having Martin vs Kessel doesn't make this a better team. We've already seen that movie.
Not only that but looking at a 4-5yr stat line of averages and trends. On a game by game basis, Sid and Geno need more help.
Those games against New York...all VERY close games. A goal here and there by Kessel could absolutely have turned the series. Same with the Boston series.
Yes, ultimately we lose series. When you lose, you lose, that's it. But in all honestly, if you objectively look at it...we are never THAT far away. We have never been blown out of a series the way we've blown others out. There's no reason to think that adding Kessel wouldn't be the little something extra we need to get past those series. Especially where scoring was an issue.
Adding to the top 6 helps the bottom 6 too. JR's search of having 4 scoring lines helps too. I'm thinking:
Perron-Sid-Horn
Plot-Malkin-Kessel
Kunitz-Sutter-Dupuis
XXXX-Sundqvist-Bennett
All scoring threats.
It's not about our defense needing to step up as much as its can our defense stay healthy.
Because if the Pens defense can be healthy when it's crunch time, it can and will make a huge impact. For how good the top 6 is now, without Letang, getting a good transition out of the Pens end is atrocious. And without Maatta there having to calm things down in his end and being an underrated puck mover himself, the defense suffers. If Pouliot can step that part of his game up (PMD), the Pens will be just fine.
The team barely had Ehrhoff healthy for the year and just lost Martin. If you get a healthy Maatta back and Letang, that defense isn't losing as much as people will swear up and down about.
The question mark with this team lies in the fact it will have 4 blueliners on it who are in their mid to early 20's. I'm completely confident in the forwards at this point.