Value of: Flyers #14 & 19 to trade up

[Legend123]

Would you do 14+19+ 2019 1st for 3rd Overall ?

lol never. That pick is staying put.

 

[Critical13]

Edmonton at 10 is your best best IMO. Not worth it.

 

[1865]

We don't really trade firsts any more. We do so well out of the mid-late picks that it doesn't make sense unless we can sneak into the top 5 somehow.

 

[Montecristo]

Curious what players would be available for 14 and/or 19 rather than moving up.

Danton heinen

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

Flyers are loaded with prospects at all positions. Let’s assume flyers want to trade picks 14&19 to get into top 10.

1. How high could they trade up using those two picks?

2. What teams might be willing to trade?

3. Is trading up even worth it given the depth of the 2018 draft?

1. Up to 13th OA.
2. I don't know.
3. Yeah.

 

[Chapin Landvogt]

Flyers are loaded with prospects at all positions. Let’s assume flyers want to trade picks 14&19 to get into top 10.

1. How high could they trade up using those two picks?

What else does PHI's roster need right now?

2. What teams might be willing to trade?

Would pick 11 and a cost-effective lower line player be of interest?

3. Is trading up even worth it given the depth of the 2018 draft?

That depends namely on if PHI wants a center like Veleno, Hayton or Kotkaniemi?

Which theoretically should be of interest.

 

[Starat327]

What else does PHI's roster need right now?



Would pick 11 and a cost-effective lower line player be of interest?

3. Is trading up even worth it given the depth of the 2018 draft?[/QUOTE]

That depends namely on if PHI wants a center like Veleno, Hayton or Kotkaniemi?

Which theoretically should be of interest.[/QUOTE]

Phillys only real need is high end wingers - prospects or young players. Every other position is covered. Trading anywhere but outside the top 3 makes no sense unless Hextall has a firm belief that someone else in that range can become that player.

 

[Tripod]

What else does PHI's roster need right now?


Would pick 11 and a cost-effective lower line player be of interest?

That depends namely on if PHI wants a center like Veleno, Hayton or Kotkaniemi?

Which theoretically should be of interest.

Couturier, Patrick, Giroux too if they want, Laughton, Frost, Vorobyev, Laczynski, Rubstov, Bunnaman

To me, the Flyers don't "need" to move up to grab a C. In no way do I trade away both 1st to move up. I grab the best forward and best dman with the 2 picks if things fall right. Just take the 2 BPA and file them away to help in a few years if things go well.

 

[mariolemieux66]

Mtl 3rd OA, Byron and Lernout for Philadelphia 2018 14th OA , 2018 19th OA, Frost and Morin.

 

[Starat327]

Mtl 3rd OA, Byron and Lernout for Philadelphia 2018 14th OA , 2018 19th OA, Frost and Morin.

Nope.

 

[Tripod]

Mtl 3rd OA, Byron and Lernout for Philadelphia 2018 14th OA , 2018 19th OA, Frost and Morin.

Easy no From Philly.

 

[CaptBagel]

If Bouchard and Dobson are gone at 9 the Rangers should trade down for those flyer picks
We could get Kaut and Lundestrom then with our later picks get a couple RDs like Nils Lundqvist and Woo

 

[SnS]

I don’t think we need to move up. (Unless it’s to top 3 or so)

We have a deep pool, I think we could use a young player who hasn’t yet broke out or hasn’t had consistency.

Soon enough if we keep having a plethora of picks, we aren’t going to have anywhere for them to play.

Either stay the course, or try a swing a trade for a young player or something to that effect.

 

[Souffle]

I would be interested in #3 overall from Montreal, but the cost seems prohibitive.

I wonder if Patrick straight up for the 3OA could work. Philly might not want to do it, but kinda makes sense for Montreal, if they were even open to trading the pick.

Anyway, it's what I would suggest in response if Philly asked about the 3OA. If it had to be a quantity deal from Philly's perspective, then I would act like a robber and demand a package that would make Hextall hang up angrily.

 

[SnS]

I wonder if Patrick straight up for the 3OA could work. Philly might not want to do it, but kinda makes sense for Montreal, if they were even open to trading the pick.

Anyway, it's what I would suggest in response if Philly asked about the 3OA. If it had to be a quantity deal from Philly's perspective, then I would act like a robber and demand a package that would make Hextall hang up angrily.

We will keep Patrick.

 

[Flukeshot]

Ottawa 4th and Detroit 6th are two teams that in my opinion need quantity of prospects. Unfortunately they also need high quality. But they may be the more realistic targets.

14 + 19 is not enough for 4 or 6. Also not sure a 2nd rd pick added does it. May need to float in someone like Morin who was 11th in 2014.

I also think anything after 7th or 8th is pointless. After that you are probably looking at 14 + a 2nd if it is only to move up 5 spots.

 

[Scintillating10]

Flyers are loaded with prospects at all positions. Let’s assume flyers want to trade picks 14&19 to get into top 10.

1. How high could they trade up using those two picks?

2. What teams might be willing to trade?

3. Is trading up even worth it given the depth of the 2018 draft?

Should get you in top 10. But not much more.

 

[Scintillating10]

Would you do 14+19+ 2019 1st for 3rd Overall ?

Who do you see the Habs wanting at 14 and 19?

 

[Souffle]

We will keep Patrick.

Makes sense. It would be my response too. But also illustrates why Montreal should keep the 3OA. If one of its best bargaining chips can't address a need in a trade, then probably shouldn't make the trade.

 

[pmwlker]

.

 

[ole ole]

Who do you see the Habs wanting at 14 and 19?

Nothing worth trading the 3rdOA for.

 

[nuckfan insk]

I’m interested from Vancouver

 

[The Madrigal]

I’m interested from Vancouver

14, 19, 50

for

7, 130

 

[nuckfan insk]

14, 19, 50

for

7, 130

How about 14, 19 and 2019(2nd) for 7

 

[The Madrigal]

How about 14, 19 and 2019(2nd) for 7

Done