Line Combos: Florida Panthers line up for 2017-2018

Brokin

Registered User
Nov 30, 2014
4,673
339
You can put Ekblad with Matheson. If you don't, based on your logic, one of Yandle, Ekblad, or Matheson is going to be playing on the third pair, not going to happen.
Please, Yandle is a PP specialist period. The man is swiss cheese on skates defensively and his turnovers last year whiffing on passes was embarrassing. They need to cover his 6 with Petro. My pairings of Ek/McCoshen, Pysyk/Matheson, Yandle/Petro are the only ones that make sense. We don't have any bonafide first pairing players until one of these guys starts to show up regularly at the all-star game. :)
 

RainingRats

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
21,649
4,797
Please, Yandle is a PP specialist period. The man is swiss cheese on skates defensively and his turnovers last year whiffing on passes was embarrassing. They need to cover his 6 with Petro. My pairings of Ek/McCoshen, Pysyk/Matheson, Yandle/Petro are the only ones that make sense. We don't have any bonafide first pairing players until one of these guys starts to show up regularly at the all-star game. :)

Not true at all about Yandle's defensive game. Completely wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: batting1k

Brokin

Registered User
Nov 30, 2014
4,673
339
Boughner has talked a lot about improving the PP and I don't see how you move Yandle if that's your goal. Yandle isn't going anywhere.

Brown is being overrated by you. So is Weegar. Petro is being underrated and to think either of those two could replace Petro is overly optimistic.
Friedman reported at the combine that he heard the rumor that Yandle was being asked to drop his NMC. Then 10 days later the Panthers verified that they would not ask him to do that. Why did it take them 10 days? Weegar certainly is not in the same league at this point as Yandle on the PP, but he isn't as far behind as you think. Matheson has already stated he wants more PP time although he is not a PP QB but more of a weapon who's skating puts extra pressure on the defense. Realistically I think we are stuck with Yandle as he has final say, so the only way Weegar gets in the lineup this year is if they move Pysyk before the TDL.

The success on the PP will be determined by getting bodies in front of the goalie this year and abandoning the multiple peripheral passes that waste time.

Brown has had a nice camp. He hasn't let anyone get in behind him with great gap control and positioning. He also has taken some shots from the point that has been on goal in both the scrimmage and in Nashville. People forget that we drafted him 2013 and it was the 14-15 season when he Captained (2nd yr in a row) Oshawa and won the Memorial Cup. He also was credited as a key factor in shutting down Connor McDavid (blanking him twice) in winning their series 4-1. He's no superstar but he understands how to work with teammates to clog up the middle and take away the danger zone. Don't sell Brown short. :)
 

Brokin

Registered User
Nov 30, 2014
4,673
339
Not true at all about Yandle's defensive game. Completely wrong.
Yeah that's why he was a -6 with only 23 of his 41 pts coming 5 on 5. His giveaway/takeaway ratio was 3 to 1 and Brian Campbell's last 2 years when he was an old man was 2 to 1. Campbell was also a plus 4 and 33 his last 2 years. Don't tell me Yandle has a good defensive game.:laugh:
 

Benched

Registered User
Jan 2, 2007
8,981
411
Please, Yandle is a PP specialist period. The man is swiss cheese on skates defensively and his turnovers last year whiffing on passes was embarrassing. They need to cover his 6 with Petro. My pairings of Ek/McCoshen, Pysyk/Matheson, Yandle/Petro are the only ones that make sense. We don't have any bonafide first pairing players until one of these guys starts to show up regularly at the all-star game. :)

Ek can skate with Petro. Petro hits and uses his size advantageously defensively. He also makes good outlet passes. I think this year could be his breakout season.
 

RainingRats

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
21,649
4,797
Friedman reported at the combine that he heard the rumor that Yandle was being asked to drop his NMC. Then 10 days later the Panthers verified that they would not ask him to do that. Why did it take them 10 days? Weegar certainly is not in the same league at this point as Yandle on the PP, but he isn't as far behind as you think. Matheson has already stated he wants more PP time although he is not a PP QB but more of a weapon who's skating puts extra pressure on the defense. Realistically I think we are stuck with Yandle as he has final say, so the only way Weegar gets in the lineup this year is if they move Pysyk before the TDL.

The success on the PP will be determined by getting bodies in front of the goalie this year and abandoning the multiple peripheral passes that waste time.

Brown has had a nice camp. He hasn't let anyone get in behind him with great gap control and positioning. He also has taken some shots from the point that has been on goal in both the scrimmage and in Nashville. People forget that we drafted him 2013 and it was the 14-15 season when he Captained (2nd yr in a row) Oshawa and won the Memorial Cup. He also was credited as a key factor in shutting down Connor McDavid (blanking him twice) in winning their series 4-1. He's no superstar but he understands how to work with teammates to clog up the middle and take away the danger zone. Don't sell Brown short. :)

Yandle and Weegar are not in the same universe, hell, they're not even in the same league (yet)! Weever is no way a replacement for Yandle, now or in the future. Yandle has been a top PP producer for d-man the last five or six years before he was traded to the Panthers. You also need other d-man besides Yandle.

The PP will be improved by shooting more and getting traffic in front go the net.
 

RainingRats

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
21,649
4,797
Yeah that's why he was a -6 with only 23 of his 41 pts coming 5 on 5. His giveaway/takeaway ratio was 3 to 1 and Brian Campbell's last 2 years when he was an old man was 2 to 1. Campbell was also a plus 4 and 33 his last 2 years. Don't tell me Yandle has a good defensive game.:laugh:

He didn't have a good year defensively because the team was a mess. He's a solid defender. You're wrong. You think he should play third pair, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinions.
 

Jean Luc Discard

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
14,560
8,608
Matheson and Yandle are 1 and 2 on the left side and locked up long term.

Yandle is averaging almost 25min TOI per game which way too much for him as an offensive minded dman who's getting caught on the wrong side of the puck from time to time. He's locked up long term but incorrectly used atm, should be more a 3rd pairing PP specialist with ~17min per game.
 

TheImpatientPanther

Registered User
Jan 17, 2013
28,540
25,520
Ontario, Canada
Yandle is averaging almost 25min TOI per game which way too much for him as an offensive minded dman who's getting caught on the wrong side of the puck from time to time. He's locked up long term but incorrectly used atm, should be more a 3rd pairing PP specialist with ~17min per game.

I agree on reducing his minutes but I guess BB doesn't think Matheson is ready for a big increase in his.

Ideally Matheson is ready for a bigger role next year where he plays more 5 on 5 and gets both PP and PK time.

Yandle would be a great #3 with Pysyk if he could get back to last year's game, that would be a fine pairing or Weegar may get a shot if he keeps progressing.
 

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
21,153
17,055
Florida
Yandle is averaging almost 25min TOI per game which way too much for him as an offensive minded dman who's getting caught on the wrong side of the puck from time to time. He's locked up long term but incorrectly used atm, should be more a 3rd pairing PP specialist with ~17min per game.
What a completely uneducated post. You don’t pay someone 6+ million to play 3rd pair. He’s a second pair D man. But you also think Huberdeau sucks so I know your agenda here.
 

batting1k

Registered User
Mar 3, 2013
19,644
15,174
Yandle is averaging almost 25min TOI per game which way too much for him as an offensive minded dman who's getting caught on the wrong side of the puck from time to time. He's locked up long term but incorrectly used atm, should be more a 3rd pairing PP specialist with ~17min per game.

He's playing 25 mins a night because we have no one else capable of doing it. Ideally he's a second pair guy that plays against the other team's middle-6. Either way, he's fine. He's not really the problem on the top pair.
 

Brokin

Registered User
Nov 30, 2014
4,673
339
^Yandle has his warts but he's been good the last 2 months. He is easily the best passer on the blueline. The only problems I have with him since he's been here is he gets running around in front of his own net and he gets easily stripped on pinch's. He's been very good coming out of his own zone. He's earning his $$ at this point no matter where he plays.

Now his partner at $9M this season is another story. Him I would have no problem bumping down to the 3rd if he doesn't get back on track. As I said, he would fly thru waivers unclaimed if they ever elected to send him down to Kinnear to re-boot. :)
 

FrolikFan67

Registered User
Apr 29, 2012
7,182
3,326
Now his partner at $9M this season is another story. Him I would have no problem bumping down to the 3rd if he doesn't get back on track. As I said, he would fly thru waivers unclaimed if they ever elected to send him down to Kinnear to re-boot. :)
as weird as it may seem i wouldnt totally be against that. i know itd never happen, but like he even admitted he shined the most when facing lesser competition/easier minutes. youd have a threat on each line and honestly who cares what the lines are if the results are wins. yandle can handle the top line if you give him someone who can defend well, matheson can handle 2nd line same thing with him. say weegar-ekblad for a couple games on the 3rd. they get more time than a typical 3rd pairing and he'd get pp time too. but its not as crazy as it seems. at this point why not try it.

to be clear im not saying hes a 3rd line talent. hes a strong goal scoring #3 as of now probably. im just thinking what could possibly give us the best opportunity to win in theory.
 

IceManCat

#TheFloridaPanthers
Jul 13, 2006
6,106
2,605
The Rat Den
Has Trocheck played with McCann this year ? Id wonder how Trocheck plays with another "sniper" on his wing. Such as McCann or possible Tippett in the future.
 

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
21,153
17,055
Florida
Has Trocheck played with McCann this year ? Id wonder how Trocheck plays with another "sniper" on his wing. Such as McCann or possible Tippett in the future.
I think McCann would do well with Tro. I don’t get why were wasting McCann on the bottom two lines. He has top 6 talent. It’s jsut a matter of him putting it together.
 

ShootIt

Registered User
Nov 8, 2008
18,052
5,027
I think McCann would do well with Tro. I don’t get why were wasting McCann on the bottom two lines. He has top 6 talent. It’s jsut a matter of him putting it together.

Last year he looked off at LW imo, and when this year started he clicked for a short bit point wise at center. Lately, he hasn't done much while playing center, so I wouldn't be too opposed to seeing him back on the LW.
Dunno if it would hurt or not.
Throw Malgin/Bjugstad back at #3 center, the middle six is a shitshow anyways, not like we would lose any production.
 

RainingRats

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
21,649
4,797
I think McCann would do well with Tro. I don’t get why were wasting McCann on the bottom two lines. He has top 6 talent. It’s jsut a matter of him putting it together.
For a coach who isn't afraid to shake up the lineup I'm surprised he hasn't tried McCann with Tro. I guess he's trying to get McCann to own the 3C role. It would be worth a shot. Nothing to lose at this point. Could put Malgin or Bjugstad as 3C.

McCann's issue is that he's inconsistent with his effort level. The skill is there. Maybe playing with Tro would wake him up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaos2k7

FinlandPanther

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2009
21,153
17,055
Florida
For a coach who isn't afraid to shake up the lineup I'm surprised he hasn't tried McCann with Tro. I guess he's trying to get McCann to own the 3C role. It would be worth a shot. Nothing to lose at this point. Could put Malgin or Bjugstad as 3C.

McCann's issue is that he's inconsistent with his effort level. The skill is there. Maybe playing with Tro would wake him up.
Exactly. McCann is not a bottom 6 player. I think him and Tro would FOR SURE be better than McGinn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RainingRats

Mogo

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 26, 2002
24,787
9,062
HBD
McCann-Trocheck-Bjugstad
Brickley-Malgin-Scevariour
Haley-MacK-MyGin
 

GermanPanther

Foundation Defense
Dec 21, 2015
5,579
1,381
Munich, Germany
HBD
McCann-Trocheck-Bjugstad
Brickley-Malgin-Scevariour
Haley-MacK-MyGin

HBD
Malgin - Trocheck - Bjugstad
Brickley - McCann - Mamin
Mcginn - Mckenzie - Hawrlyuk

Believe me that will never happen or DT can back his stuff and can leave the Office. Or with Bjugstad on line 3.
Only to mention it. If Bjugstad and McGinn play 3rd and 4th Line with spend 7.4 Million on two Winger. That is the Mone you get a garantee Top6 Winger.
When you look at other Franchises, the most 3rd and 4th lIner doesnt cost them more then 4-8 on 2 complete Lines.
We would spend 7 Mio for two players on the Bottom 6, omg when will this GM wake up and do the stuff he has to do, to bring this Franchise in the right direction.
 

FrolikFan67

Registered User
Apr 29, 2012
7,182
3,326
Huberdeau-Barkov-Dadonov
McCann-Trocheck-Malgin
McGinn-Bjugstad-Vrbata
Haley-MacKenzie-Sceviour
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad