I don't believe that carries any weight as an arguement.
Teams always take advantage of other teams. At the deadline, teams that sell players to contenders are taking advantage of another teams' need to improve. That is why player values at the deadline are typically higher than any other time during the season.
I could argue Ottawa took advantage of Sarnia's need to improve last year when we traded Konecny when we fleeced them for the ridiculous return we received.
It is the nature of sport for players to take advantage of other players and teams to take advantage of other teams.
The goal is to not leave yourself open to be taken advantage of. Flint's organization left a big gaping hole open for other teams to take advantage of. They have no one to blame but themselves. Like I said before......
DON'T GET BITTER, GET BETTER!
Big difference here with Konecny, Ottawa had a list of teams (I said teams with "s") creating a bidding war for Konecny's services. In Bitten's case only one team on the list of preferred direction, placing Flint management in a terrible disadvantage. That is not fair competition if you ask me, matter of fact there is no competition at all, I would suggest the league to stepup in these situation to insure fair market values.