Turning Mangiapanese
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2011
- 1,553
- 620
As an owner of a well maintained ignore list it's more like:Abe Simpson turn around gif.
As an owner of a well maintained ignore list it's more like:Abe Simpson turn around gif.
Sure he is.Fro isn’t going to keep up that scoring pace that he did from last night. But I like what Peters is doing. Fro is actually quite skilled and is capable of scoring a lot more than he does. But he focuses most of his energy on being a good defensive player. Peters I think, is going to get him to try to score more. I like this.
As an owner of a well maintained ignore list it's more like:
Fro isn’t going to keep up that scoring pace that he did from last night. But I like what Peters is doing. Fro is actually quite skilled and is capable of scoring a lot more than he does. But he focuses most of his energy on being a good defensive player. Peters I think, is going to get him to try to score more. I like this.
I really don't mind the idea of Fro/Czarnik moving around depending on the matchup.
Like, when we play tough teams like Boston and we need a shutdown line, Fro comes up. When we play a deeper team like Vegas where all lines have to be active and aware, Czarnik comes back up.
As a neutral observer I hope there's no suspension, and IMHO a 2 min penalty is a bit harsh.Anybody hearing anything about the DoPS reviewing the McAvoy-Gaudreau hit? Any news about Gaudreau?
As a neutral observer I hope there's no suspension, and IMHO a 2 min penalty is a bit harsh.
McAvoy cannot help that that opponents now are smaller than ever, and when a clean hit is now being looked under the microscope...Jeez.
It was an interference penalty... which was the right call. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 1/2 games to send a message, and I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't taken a second look at it at all.As a neutral observer I hope there's no suspension, and IMHO a 2 min penalty is a bit harsh.
McAvoy cannot help that that opponents now are smaller than ever, and when a clean hit is now being looked under the microscope...Jeez.
What I don't understand is the people saying "if he was 50 lbs heavier it wouldn't be an issue"
Um, yeah... Physics would disagree with you.
Being lighter is a benefit in this case.
I think the only people saying that are being ironic. They were probably part of the Pettersson/Matheson discussion and are resentful of that argument being used against Pettersson (because it's a bullshit argument for an illegal play).What I don't understand is the people saying "if he was 50 lbs heavier it wouldn't be an issue"
Um, yeah... Physics would disagree with you.
Being lighter is a benefit in this case.