Seems like it.What exactly is the purpose of this? basically when nobody picks him up they can use that against him?
What exactly is the purpose of this? basically when nobody picks him up they can use that against him?
One day Friedman will figure out the abbreviation for Calgary is CGY, not CAL.
Wake and bake eh?In the tease, I saw "Flames Waive Bret.." And boy, did my brain fill in the rest. For whatever reason, I assumed it was Bret Hart, and I was like, "I didn't know Calgary's relationship with the Hitman was bad!"
Kinda like how Burke wears his tie wrong on purpose, both just trying to be idiotsHe's actually said in his blog that he does this on purpose. Same with WIN for WPG.
Buffalo could probably use him.
He is much better than Treliving seems to be giving him credit for.
He's really not very good. Valimaki would be a much better fit in that 3LD hole.
Stone/Kulak was our best third pairing we've had in like 5 years.
OKG is probably having a meltdown and/or preparing a 2-page rant against Treliving at the moment
My evaluation too. Okay filler if you need a capable body, but he isn't going to do anything outstanding in any way - not in a positive way anyway. That's not enough when you have guys chomping at the bit who could come in and make a difference. He's like a softer Jason Strudwick - he can hold a spot for you, but you can't say you have a good blueline if he's on it regularly.If you like softies, you like him
He is not bad but doesn't do anything for me... A filler
A) nah, Schlemko/Diaz was better
B) they weren't very good at all. Kulak has no composure in the offensive zone and often gets beat on the rush
C) Valimaki and Andersson are both better than Kulak
D) Michael Stone was the good one on the pairing, and he elevated Kulak more than anything