Friedman: Flames trying to acquire a first round pick

[MMC]

31 Thoughts: Will the Calgary Flames trade for a first-round pick? - Sportsnet.ca

Click to read more...

 

[rent free]

Rangers?

 

[belair]

Rasmus Andersson to the Rangers.

 

[TorontoTrades]

Fine send us Hamilton

 

[north49er]

Who would they give up? If they want a high draft pick they'd have to give one of their top players, something I don't see them doing. Unless they finish really bad and then maybe prospects and their 2nd round pick? Why not just wait for the 2nd round?

 

[Potty John]

Would be really nice to get one, but I don't see that happening with out assets.

 

[KPower]

Burke and Treliving in full desperation mode.

 

[PinkFly]

Leafs 2018 1st, 2018 2nd, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

For

Calgary 2018 1st, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

Send us Tkachuk, and we give you Vancouver 1st.

 

[I Pity The Foo]

Leafs 2018 1st, 2018 2nd, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

For

Calgary 2018 1st, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

Huh

 

[Wayne Primeau]

Leafs 2018 1st, 2018 2nd, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

For

Calgary 2018 1st, 2019 1st, 2019 2nd

Are you making that deal with the Islanders?

 

[migi]

Adam Fox + 4th for Preds 1st.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Send us Tkachuk, and we give you Vancouver 1st.

This might sound insane, but if Canucks win the lottery I'd easily give up Tkachuk and more. Size and nastiness is overrated, especially if you can get Dahlin.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Adam Fox + 4th for Preds 1st.

Honestly with Fox possibly not signing with us I may be entitled to do it, that is if Dominik Bokk is still available.

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

This might sound insane, but if Canucks win the lottery I'd easily give up Tkachuk and more. Size and nastiness is overrated, especially if you can get Dahlin.

Please do. We have a problem trying to select a bona fide first-rounder, despite having early 1st picks.

 

[Wayne Primeau]

The Flames are not trading Tkachuk, especially not to Vancouver. That'd be lunacy.

 

[phlocky]

As a flyers fan I'd give up our 1st (say around 15) and Myers for Tkachuk. Probably an overpayment but that would let us deal Simmonds and still have that net front presence we need.


Am I really far off?

 

[Potty John]

I actually am not opposed to the idea of trading Fox at the draft unless he has signed before then.

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

The Flames are not trading Tkachuk, especially not to Vancouver. That'd be lunacy.

Apparently, Vali Maki Sushi has better insight than you do.

 

[Wayne Primeau]

As a flyers fan I'd give up our 1st (say around 15) and Myers for Tkachuk. Probably an overpayment but that would let us deal Simmonds and still have that net front presence we need.


Am I really far off?

You're miles off. Any deal around Tkachuk would start with Provorov or Konecny and a first and go from there.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

As a flyers fan I'd give up our 1st (say around 15) and Myers for Tkachuk. Probably an overpayment but that would let us deal Simmonds and still have that net front presence we need.


Am I really far off?

That is absolutely terrible for the Flames. The last thing the Flames need are RHS Dman. RHS wingers are their main need. A lot of Flames and Flyers fans probably won't, but I'd do Provorov and a 1st for Tkachuk, or Konency, a 1st, and a one of your good LHD prospects. That's about it.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Apparently, Vali Maki Sushi has better insight than you do.

Eh I'm kinda notorious for not being a well liked poster because of ridiculous proposals on hfFlames haha. But if Dahlin is available you give up anything to get him especially as the Flames could use a left side LHS Dman as well.

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

Eh I'm kinda notorious for not being a well liked poster because of ridiculous proposals on hfFlames haha. But if Dahlin is available you give up anything to get him especially as the Flames could use a left side LHS Dman as well.

It's okay; you can't be worse than people who can't even spell players' names (i.e. Tarensako).

 

[NitHeel]

You're miles off. Any deal around Tkachuk would start with Provorov or Konecny and a first and go from there.

Could we not do this? The Flyers are obviously not moving Provorov and they're certainly not moving a first with him. Perfectly fine if you don't like the offer phlocky posted but we don't need to send the thread into the spiral of doom because of it.

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

Could we not do this? The Flyers are obviously not moving Provorov and they're certainly not moving a first with him. Perfectly fine if you don't like the offer phlocky posted but we don't need to send the thread into the spiral of doom because of it.

You might be undervaluing Tkachuk there.