Skip2myBordyloo
Stay the course
- Apr 7, 2010
- 10,800
- 402
The Flames last man back didn't seem very concerned about the puck
No way he would have caught it.
The Flames last man back didn't seem very concerned about the puck
If that pass back to the point actually went to the D and he shot and scored would the refs have reviewed it to see if they should have blown the play down from weber touching it ?? no they wouldn't, there is no way that should have been reviewable. Hard to argue with the tinfoil hats when crap like this goes on. never seen that reviewed in my life.
The Flames last man back didn't seem very concerned about the puck
Friedman said that the league told the refs that no, they couldn't review that play, so in the end it was the same as in your scenario, they just took awhile to determine that.
The Devils did that once against Ottawa and I think Damian Rhodes got credit for the goal.
Why do Flames fans ALWAYS have to mention the Oilers in every context? They live in your heads so much they should be playing you rent, but why?
Looked to me like the Calgary defenceman could've stopped the puck from going in if he went all out for it but just kind of :Effort:'d it.
Didn't even try.
Because they're historically bad and impossible to ignore. The entire league talks about the Oilers for that very reason.
Yeah that's why, good catch.
Never seen anything like that before live.
Yeah that's why, good catch.
If the Flames player who scored on his own net were mic'd up, he could be heard saying "For McDavid!" before that shot.
Now THAT'S how you tank. Take note, NHL.
Now THAT'S how you tank. Take note, NHL.
On December 5, the Flames were 19 points ahead of the Oilers. The Flames have lost eight straight games since then, and they're still ahead of the Oilers by 17 points. There's nothing the Flames can do to catch up.