613Leafer
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 12,909
- 3,777
The Bolland contract looked absolutely terrible from day 1. The guy hadnt scored more than 25 points in either of his two previous seasons, had missed ~45+ games both of the previous seasons, and had missed time on a bunch of seasons before that as well.
If Bolland played at his absolute peak for that whole contract with virtually no injuries (i.e. as a ~45 point checking centre), it STILL would have been on the more expensive side, and there was zero reason to expect he'd come close to playing at that level for 5 years. Physical checking line players often decline at an earlier age, and this is a guy with major injury history.
There's no defending this move. Sure, it's cap management, but its only necessary because they made a really really dumb move two years ago in signing him. If the average joe fan can look at that signing and know that its terrible, then multi-million dollar management teams should easily easily avoid it. Reminds me of the Clarkson contract.
If Bolland played at his absolute peak for that whole contract with virtually no injuries (i.e. as a ~45 point checking centre), it STILL would have been on the more expensive side, and there was zero reason to expect he'd come close to playing at that level for 5 years. Physical checking line players often decline at an earlier age, and this is a guy with major injury history.
There's no defending this move. Sure, it's cap management, but its only necessary because they made a really really dumb move two years ago in signing him. If the average joe fan can look at that signing and know that its terrible, then multi-million dollar management teams should easily easily avoid it. Reminds me of the Clarkson contract.