hawksfan50
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 14,106
- 1,983
TOEWS D+
HOSSA F+
SHAW C
PANARIN B+
KANE A-
ANISIMOV B
TT C+
BICKELL F-
DESJARDINS C-
GARBUTT F-
( cannot rate Rasmussen, Danault ....too small a sample of games to grade properly).
KRUGER F
KEITH B-
SEABROOK B-
HAMMER C+
ROZSIVAL B
TVR C-
CC A-
Darling C
(too small a sample size to grade Gustafsson yet).
Yes I mark hard...the marks are based on both contribution to the team and some assessment of relative to each player's own highest standards..
For instance ...Kane gets A- ....tremendous contribution to the team but still could improve some aspects ...if I gave A+ it means the highest possibleblevel/no room.for any omprovement
How can he go from A- to A+ in the 3rd half? More good shifts per game ...stronger compete on the back-check and d-zone checking while still producing g off season at te same level.
Toews gets a D+ because except for a handful of games so far he has not hustled enough ...not shot enough.
.and not taken the puck enough to generate expected offense 9f a $10.5 million player.Based on his own high standards he has not lived upto them most of the first half. Vast room to improve to get to his A game more 9f ten. .He has been A+ on faceoff and about C meh level.pn goal scoring to expectation.But especially 5x5 he just does not seem like any danger threat for opponents .
AND SO based on him not being anywhere near top form consistently..I have to grade him at D+ only.
SEABROOK'S top form is about a B+ ...so B- reflects a few games where he just is off mentally or not moving well defensively..He is producing offense this year..
Keith has produced offense since getting back from.injury ...but defensively too many sloppy or off top form defensive efforts
.a mixed bag lower than his top form.
Hence B- for him.
HOSSA F+
SHAW C
PANARIN B+
KANE A-
ANISIMOV B
TT C+
BICKELL F-
DESJARDINS C-
GARBUTT F-
( cannot rate Rasmussen, Danault ....too small a sample of games to grade properly).
KRUGER F
KEITH B-
SEABROOK B-
HAMMER C+
ROZSIVAL B
TVR C-
CC A-
Darling C
(too small a sample size to grade Gustafsson yet).
Yes I mark hard...the marks are based on both contribution to the team and some assessment of relative to each player's own highest standards..
For instance ...Kane gets A- ....tremendous contribution to the team but still could improve some aspects ...if I gave A+ it means the highest possibleblevel/no room.for any omprovement
How can he go from A- to A+ in the 3rd half? More good shifts per game ...stronger compete on the back-check and d-zone checking while still producing g off season at te same level.
Toews gets a D+ because except for a handful of games so far he has not hustled enough ...not shot enough.
.and not taken the puck enough to generate expected offense 9f a $10.5 million player.Based on his own high standards he has not lived upto them most of the first half. Vast room to improve to get to his A game more 9f ten. .He has been A+ on faceoff and about C meh level.pn goal scoring to expectation.But especially 5x5 he just does not seem like any danger threat for opponents .
AND SO based on him not being anywhere near top form consistently..I have to grade him at D+ only.
SEABROOK'S top form is about a B+ ...so B- reflects a few games where he just is off mentally or not moving well defensively..He is producing offense this year..
Keith has produced offense since getting back from.injury ...but defensively too many sloppy or off top form defensive efforts
.a mixed bag lower than his top form.
Hence B- for him.