Final Results: Shootout- Yes or No

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Bring Back Bucky, Dec 13, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!
    Hi, Shootout, yes or no???
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2004
  2. Amen evil king

    Amen evil king Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,486
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    101
    I'm on the fence. I don't think they're needed, but it could add some excitement.
     
  3. Orv

    Orv Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Calgary, Ab/Eston,SK
    No thank-you.
     
  4. acr*

    acr* Guest

    It's like the NBA deciding games with a slam dunk contest or MLB going to Homerun Derby instead of Extra Innings
     
  5. Amen evil king

    Amen evil king Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,486
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    101
    No, it's not.
     
  6. jiggs 10

    jiggs 10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    3,541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hockeytown, ND
    Home Page:
    It's WORSE!

    Hockey is a TEAM game. To lose a TEAM game by means of a silly drill used at the end of a Mite's practice to sharpen a goalie is RIDICULOUS! It would be the same as the NFL deciding OT games by having a quarterback throw a ball through a tire on a tree branch! Or the NBA saying "First one to make 10 free throws wins!" It is NO way to end a game!
     
  7. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!
    So far 85% of you cheeky devils don't support this idea. Just out of curiosity, who WAS asked for an opinion on this matter, badminton fans??? :dunno: So many ways to improve the game and they came up with this???
     
  8. tripledekehockey

    tripledekehockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    pittsburgh pa
    its kool in the minors, but not in the nhl
     
  9. HfxMoose

    HfxMoose Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Specialist
    Location:
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    No thanks.
     
  10. Ismellofhockey

    Ismellofhockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Or like the World Cup of Soccer deciding games with a shootout after a few overtime periods... oh wait, that's what they do.
    As much as I don't like shootouts, comparing them to a slamdunk contest is silly.

    IMO overtime is as exciting as it gets and I don't feel snubbed after a tie, I just think it's trying to address a problem (lack of excitment) by putting a pretty flower at the top instead of going to its roots (obstruction).
     
  11. Charge_Seven

    Charge_Seven Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    4,631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'd like 20 minutes of OT, followed by a shootout.

    No more points for ties.
     
  12. Lionel Hutz

    Lionel Hutz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    13,349
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    Locking the Lounge??
  13. leafaholix*

    leafaholix* Guest

    It's a team sport, not a "who has the 5 most skilled offensive weapons" sport.
     
  14. Riddarn

    Riddarn 1980-2011

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Shootouts are bad, mmkay? :shakehead
     
  15. TORRUS

    TORRUS Registered User

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Beli
    Don't compare regular NHL season shootouts with the knock out system of the World cup of soccer. It's not even close the same thing.
    Although I'm aginst the shootouts, I would tolerate them as long as they are just part of the regular season. Having them in the playoffs would RUIN the game of hockey! You remember 2003 Toronto-Philadelphia series? Imagine that series being decided by shootout. Today, nobody would remember it and talk about it. There is nothing better then interesting, nail-bitting tripple overtime in the playoffs.
     
  16. FLYLine27*

    FLYLine27* BUCH

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Messages:
    42,410
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    PO
    Location:
    NY
    Yes it is. Its an individual compentition..no teamwork. It is EXACTLY like that.

    My answer is of course NO...and im glad to see the majority is in favor of no.
     
  17. Seachd

    Seachd Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    19,651
    Likes Received:
    557
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    The Fail
    Home Page:
    No. They're not necessary, and they won't be exciting.
     
  18. J17 Vs Proclamation

    J17 Vs Proclamation Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,025
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    College baby!
    Location:
    Reading.
    On the fence. I love shootouts. Its great in soccer (damn Portugal) but not sure it would work in hockey. If there were to be a shootout it should come after a shootout. Whoever compared it to a slamdunk contest has been smoking to much wacky backy. Slamdunk is all about skill, explosive power and height. Shootouts don't all ways favour the skilled player.
     
  19. Chili

    Chili Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,974
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Sugar Mountain
    Absolutely no!

    They will lose their appeal in a very short amount of time. Ask the Swedes.
     
  20. Charge_Seven

    Charge_Seven Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    4,631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That I agree with.

    I don't want playoff shootouts. Just regular season, because I hate ties.
     
  21. Ismellofhockey

    Ismellofhockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    I don't know if you read my entire post or not but I agree with that statement completely, I hate the idea of shootouts in the regular season, let alone the playoffs.
    I was simply pointing out that shootouts are not like a slam dunk competition to determine the victor of a game.
     
  22. Terrier

    Terrier Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,888
    Likes Received:
    340
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Location:
    Newton, MA
    Home Page:
    Leave the shootouts to the minor leagues. They don't belong in NHL games, assuming we see NHL games again. Believe me, halfway through the season, we'll be getting sick of them. When the league introduced hurry-up faceoffs and reduced game times, I thought they should simply extend the 4-on-4 OT to ten minutes.
     
  23. misfit

    misfit 5-14-6-1

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    16,307
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    just north of...everything
    I don't know why ties are viewed as such a horrible part of the game in the first place. It's no the ties that are the problem, it's awarding teams for not winning, and "playing for a tie/OT". I don't feel the least bit cheated if I'm at a game and it ends in a tie as long as it's good hockey for 60 minutes. What gets to me, is when the last 20 minutes of a game is played with all 10 players in the neutral zone. I think the problem could be solved by simply not rewarding points for anything but a win. If you lose...0 points, if you tie...0 points, if you win...1/2/3(whatever number you want) points! There you go, problem solved, teams start playing to win not to simply "not lose". No need for a skills competition after every game.
     
  24. salty justice

    salty justice Registered User

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    7,194
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Shootouts really do nothing in the end except for add excitement to casual fans. The more expensive team is going to win in a shootout 9 times out of 10, and those are already the ones at the top of the standings(sans Rangers). It just gives the better teams more points and keeps the non playoff teams where they are.

    I think they should just keep it in the minor leagues so those teams can build fan bases if it really helps marketing that much. Minor league games never come close to selling out, and it would really help the sport if those got more support.
     
  25. Guest

    Guest Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2003
    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    141
    I agree completely with you, which is why I suggest the NHL abandone the point system altogether for the standings. Instead, base the standings on the number of wins, not just the wins over losses.

    1) It allows the teams who can finish off their opponents the most to advance into the playoffs the easiest.
    2) It discourages teams from sitting back and settling for a tie, because unless they win it only hurts them.
    3) It's still just as bad as now if you end up with a tie, because nothing is settled.

    I think it'd change the whole mindset of the game from "can't lose" to "must win", where defense is more heavily associated with "can't lose" mentality and offense if more associated with "must win".

    Back on topic, I say no to the shootout, no questions asked. I don't care who win's a shootout, but I care who wins a 60-65 minute hockey game. The two are not the same thing.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"