FINA restricts transgender swimmers in elite women's events

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
106,636
19,601
Sin City

Swimming's world governing body voted to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in women's events and will look into creating an "open competition" category in a membership vote on Sunday.

FINA members voted 71.5% in favor of a policy that requires transgender swimmers to have completed their transition by age 12 to be able to compete, per the Associated Press. There are 152 national federations with voting rights. The vote applies to all events beginning on Monday. Part of the 24-page policy was a proposal for an "open competition" category.

Hmmm


"This is not saying that people are encouraged to transition by the age of 12. It’s what the scientists are saying, that if you transition after the start of puberty, you have an advantage, which is unfair,” James Pearce, who is the spokesperson for FINA president Husain Al-Musallam, told The Associated Press.

Ah, ummm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Hockey 4 Life

Registered User
Feb 10, 2012
6,093
3,133
I think this eliminates most biological advantages that could be an issue and allows transgender women and other women to compete on a more even playing field. It also dissuades people from claiming they are transgender fraudulently when they aren't for personal gain.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
22,179
14,088



Hmmm




Ah, ummm
Good. Glad to see science backing up what is common sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

NextBigThing

Registered User
Feb 25, 2010
795
575
Devine Rink
I don’t agree with this at all. If someone identifies as a female they should be able to participate in the female competitions. Certain people trying to make this way to complicated.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Smirnov2Chistov

BMacLeafs

Registered User
Feb 20, 2022
153
127
This just reeks of transphobia.

I don't even see why there are different divisions for men and womxn. Gender is artificially defined and is not grounded in any sort of science. All athletes should compete against each other in an open division.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Smirnov2Chistov

TK 421

Barbashev eats babies pass it on
Sep 12, 2007
6,464
6,123
I don’t agree with this at all. If someone identifies as a female they should be able to participate in the female competitions. Certain people trying to make this way to complicated.

"Identifying" as female doesn't erase the male physical advantages like greater muscle mass, bone density and testosterone production. It's a biological man competing against women no matter you how decide to word salad your way around it and it puts actual women at a serious disadvantage in sports competition.

Compete against biological men or....don't. Those are your options.
 

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,143
11,178
Murica
This just reeks of transphobia.

I don't even see why there are different divisions for men and womxn. Gender is artificially defined and is not grounded in any sort of science. All athletes should compete against each other in an open division.
This isn't about gender at all and I have to assume you aren't female because the vast majority of female athletes will welcome this because of the distinct biological differences between men and women.
 

PCSPounder

Stadium Groupie
Apr 12, 2012
2,877
574
The Outskirts of Nutria Nanny
Good. Glad to see science backing up what is common sense.
This has nothing to do with science.

There used to be chromosome testing for athletes. The reason this doesn’t happen is that humans aren’t so cut and dried in this way; there were all sorts of chromosomes that “didn’t belong.”

Meanwhile, look up the case of Caster Semenya.

This really is more about not wanting to upset “common sense,” for which transphobia is one segment of the issue.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Pink Mist

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
12,541
7,980
Ostsee
It also dissuades people from claiming they are transgender fraudulently when they aren't for personal gain.

Being fraudulently transgender for athletic gain is not really even a thing. And I can't really imagine it ever becoming any more so than actual men posing as actual women already is.

I agree that a policy is needed, but many arguments including some of those discussed by the FINA just reek of mere barely veiled transphobia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oknazevad

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,738
4,830
Toronto
This isn't about gender at all and I have to assume you aren't female because the vast majority of female athletes will welcome this because of the distinct biological differences between men and women.

Those female athletes you say welcome it should be careful what they wish for since while they identify biologically as a woman, for a small percentage of them their chromosomes tell a different story. As we've seen historically when they had chromosome testing in sports
 

Jets4Life

Registered User
Dec 25, 2003
7,237
4,176
Westward Ho, Alberta
This is great news. Women athletes deserve to be protected against cheating. My guess is people who support biological males competing in womens sports, have no history of participating in women's sports, or how hard it is to become an elte athlete, and all the training and sacrifices it takes to become one.
 

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
19,367
8,660
Moscow, Russia
This just reeks of transphobia.

I don't even see why there are different divisions for men and womxn. Gender is artificially defined and is not grounded in any sort of science. All athletes should compete against each other in an open division.

I agree. I think the first sport which should consider the mixing tournaments is boxing.
 

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
12,541
7,980
Ostsee
This is great news. Women athletes deserve to be protected against cheating. My guess is people who support biological males competing in womens sports, have no history of participating in women's sports, or how hard it is to become an elte athlete, and all the training and sacrifices it takes to become one.

Should XY women that are legally women since birth and identify as such be banned from women's sports again? If not, why should XY transgender women?
 

AvsBeacon

Registered User
Apr 23, 2018
153
208
Makes sense unless you think men (adult human males) and women (adult human females) are physically equal on average.

This just reeks of transphobia.

I don't even see why there are different divisions for men and womxn. Gender is artificially defined and is not grounded in any sort of science. All athletes should compete against each other in an open division.
Fair enough if you want an "open" division to be the only division. As a male I'd be fine with that but would women be happy when colleges/universities/high schools/middle schools eliminate women's only teams?
 

Jets4Life

Registered User
Dec 25, 2003
7,237
4,176
Westward Ho, Alberta
This just reeks of transphobia.

I don't even see why there are different divisions for men and womxn. Gender is artificially defined and is not grounded in any sort of science. All athletes should compete against each other in an open division.
If your goal is to kill off women's sport, by all means go for it.

If sport eliminated men's/women's classes, there would never again be a female medal winner in any sport. No women would win, or come close to medalling in Olympics, World Championships, etc. As for team sports, the top leagues would still be composed 100% of men. Women would be relegated to Tier 4 leagues.

This just reeks of misogyny.

No, I do not possess the genetics that would permit being one. Which does not mean that everyone enjoying those advantages over me should be banned.
Can you elaborate on your post.

I am 6'2/200. Many people in my family compete in sports. So I naturally have an advantage over a man who is 5'8/145.

Know how ridiculous you sound? You are on a hockey forum. The majority of NHL players are over 6 feet tall, and weigh close to 200 pounds or more, with male bone structure and muscle mass. That is just the way it is. No biological woman will ever make the NHL. The only time a woman played an exhibition game in the NHL, was 30 years ago, and that was purely for publicity purposes. She was a backup goaltender in the ECHL at her best.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
12,541
7,980
Ostsee
I am 6'2/200. Many people in my family compete in sports. So I should be banned from sports, since I have an "unfair" advantage over a man who is 5'8/145?

No, good for you. The same goes for any other advantage that people with XY chromosomes may potentially possess. Chromosome testing was abolished by the IOC in the 1990s in favor of testosterone values which enabled XY women to compete at least in principle. To limit the right of XY transgender women to compete based on the same rules as other women and in particular XY women is arbitrary.
 

NextBigThing

Registered User
Feb 25, 2010
795
575
Devine Rink
This is great news. Women athletes deserve to be protected against cheating. My guess is people who support biological males competing in womens sports, have no history of participating in women's sports, or how hard it is to become an elte athlete, and all the training and sacrifices it takes to become one.
Anyone who identifies as a female should be allowed to compete in the female competitions. Don’t like it? Too bad, life is not fair.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fatass

Jets4Life

Registered User
Dec 25, 2003
7,237
4,176
Westward Ho, Alberta
No, good for you. The same goes for any other advantage that people with XY chromosomes may potentially possess. Chromosome testing was abolished by the IOC in the 1990s in favor of testosterone values which enabled XY women to compete at least in principle. To limit the right of XY transgender women to compete based on the same rules as other women and in particular XY women is arbitrary.
Reread my post. I misunderstood your question, edited it, and reposted it 2 minutes later.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad