hockeynorth
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2017
- 12,592
- 6,386
Man, you went elite everything before elite CI opted to go elite winger over top C last time and it just didn’t resonate well.
Man, you went elite everything before elite CI opted to go elite winger over top C last time and it just didn’t resonate well.
I didn’t think my C group was that bad...Kadri Staal Kerfoot Copp...it’s just clear what the voters look for.Man, you went elite everything before elite C
I may punt on C this time like you didYeah
I didn’t think my C group was that bad...Kadri Staal Kerfoot Copp...it’s just clear what the voters look for.
Yeah
I didn’t think my C group was that bad...Kadri Staal Kerfoot Copp...it’s just clear what the voters look for.
I had some good pieces. Ovechkin, Huberdeau, Klingberg...but the first comment was “Kadri is your 1C”I may punt on C this time like you did
It was either Huberdeau or Larkin at that point and I opted for my personal BPA in Huberdeau...hindsight should have probably gone Larkin. Anyways. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.I don't think an elite 1C is needed to win these...but you need a better 1C than Kadri probably.
Going Ovechkin was fine. But going your 2LW in Huberdeau next (as good value as he was) is what hurt you most probably
Yeah I think that all of those are great pieces and I think it would have worked with a better second piece to the first line.I had some good pieces. Ovechkin, Huberdeau, Klingberg...but the first comment was “Kadri is your 1C”
Bold move, you'd basically need to be stacked ate very other position to have a chance then lolI may punt on C this time like you did
I can't trade so might as well make it interestingBold move, you'd basically need to be stacked ate very other position to have a chance then lol
I opted to go elite winger over top C last time and it just didn’t resonate well.
(everyone should go elite W over elite C)Same
It was either Huberdeau or Larkin at that point and I opted for my personal BPA in Huberdeau...hindsight should have probably gone Larkin. Anyways. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.
You had Kuch-Larkin???Well Larkin didn’t do me any good either
Hindsight would’ve had me take Malkin 1st and Kyle Connor 2nd instead of Kucherov/Larkin
And I’m in it and have been really good at drafting games and love to take players out of spiteThis draft will certainly be interesting as a lot of us have learned from our mistakes and are positioned to do much better.
I have a feeling I'm going to regret many of my picks.This draft will certainly be interesting as a lot of us have learned from our mistakes and are positioned to do much better.
(everyone should go elite W over elite C)
Who had Kucherov and Pastrnak last time, I know who had Panarin
(everyone should go elite W over elite C)
Who had Kucherov and Pastrnak last time, I know who had Panarin
This is extremely trueI drafted an Elite C and Elite W with my first 2 picks and still missed the playoffs. The hard work comes in the later rounds
I drafted an Elite C and Elite W with my first 2 picks and still missed the playoffs. The hard work comes in the later rounds