Fantasy GM Thread | Off-Season has Begun Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,782
85,108
Vancouver, BC
He would need to be traded for, so maybe the Canes would want some of our signed depth back instead. If Poolman wasn't hurt he would be an obvious candidate as Carolina would get Term vs more upside. So I could see something if they think they can get something.

I think the rumour is that Bear isn't going to get a QO from Carolina. He's going to require a $2.5 million QO from a contending team where he's their 7th defender - I don't think there's any way they do that.

To me at that salary he's a negative value asset - no different than Poolman at the same salary.

If he's a UFA and you can sign him for $1.3 or something it's a different story.
 

racerjoe

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
12,204
5,921
Vancouver
I think the rumour is that Bear isn't going to get a QO from Carolina. He's going to require a $2.5 million QO from a contending team where he's their 7th defender - I don't think there's any way they do that.

To me at that salary he's a negative value asset - no different than Poolman at the same salary.

If he's a UFA and you can sign him for $1.3 or something it's a different story.

That's fair, he is a player I would really like to take a flyer on, I just want it to be a flyer and not an entire book.
 

Diablo2020

Registered User
Feb 11, 2020
211
158
Calgary
Nils Hoglander
Jack Rathbone
Michael Ferland
Tucker Poolman
for
Brandon Carlo
Jake Debrusk

($6,891,667 plus Rathbone's RFA contract for $8,100,000)

Canucks gets some grit and goals up front and a long-term partner for Hughes or OEL signed for 5 years.

Bruins get some cap flexibility with Nils being able to be sent down to start the season while they juggle LTIR contracts, and Rathbone can help replace some of the LHD injuries to start the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glarb blarg

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
6,814
5,208
New York
Nils Hoglander
Jack Rathbone
Michael Ferland
Tucker Poolman
for
Brandon Carlo
Jake Debrusk

($6,891,667 plus Rathbone's RFA contract for $8,100,000)

Canucks gets some grit and goals up front and a long-term partner for Hughes or OEL signed for 5 years.

Bruins get some cap flexibility with Nils being able to be sent down to start the season while they juggle LTIR contracts, and Rathbone can help replace some of the LHD injuries to start the season.
I don’t hate the value of Höglander/Rathbone for Carlo/DeBrusk—but that would be a Benning-esque exchange of youth for help right now.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
23,562
37,376
Junktown
Maybe Johnson got a peek at what Millers agent is asking..If it’s outrageous the Canucks may not even bother to negotiate..?

It’s a pretty quick negotiation from the get go. “We want market value.” Which means he wants what Zibanejad got and all reports are the Canucks don’t want to do that price or term. Don’t even really need to actually exchange numbers.
 

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,645
4,026
It’s a pretty quick negotiation from the get go. “We want market value.” Which means he wants what Zibanejad got and all reports are the Canucks don’t want to do that price or term. Don’t even really need to actually exchange numbers.
While Miller's camp would definitely argue that the Zibanejad comp is market, I view it as an overpayment. Zib has had a 40 goal season and two 30 goal seasons. Miller is coming off a career year where he scored 32. His next best was 27 two years ago and 22 after that, 6 years ago. Last year Miller scored 15 goals. He definitely did well for himself having a career year but paying him for that expectation is a huge risk.

All that said, I wouldn't be surprised if Miller plays hardball. It makes no sense for him to take a discount. He's from the States and I'm sure would be quite happy to play in an american city with a lower tax bracket. .
 
  • Like
Reactions: geebaan

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,782
85,108
Vancouver, BC
While Miller's camp would definitely argue that the Zibanejad comp is market, I view it as an overpayment. Zib has had a 40 goal season and two 30 goal seasons. Miller is coming off a career year where he scored 32. His next best was 27 two years ago and 22 after that, 6 years ago. Last year Miller scored 15 goals. He definitely did well for himself having a career year but paying him for that expectation is a huge risk.

All that said, I wouldn't be surprised if Miller plays hardball. It makes no sense for him to take a discount. He's from the States and I'm sure would be quite happy to play in an american city with a lower tax bracket. .

Over the last 3 seasons, Miller has averaged 88 points/82 GP and Zibanejad has averaged 87/82. They're about as close as you can get as comparables.
 

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,645
4,026
Over the last 3 seasons, Miller has averaged 88 points/82 GP and Zibanejad has averaged 87/82. They're about as close as you can get as comparables.
Sure Miller has more assists. Goals are valued more highly for wingers though. But I can't disagree it's the best comp as comps go, since Zib just signed. There's more variability year over year so the most recent precedent is usually the best. Still think Zib > Miller.

Edit: I guess the fact that Miller also plays centre would increase his value IDK
 

timw33

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 18, 2007
25,770
19,662
Victoria
Over the last 3 seasons, Miller has averaged 88 points/82 GP and Zibanejad has averaged 87/82. They're about as close as you can get as comparables.

And Couture signed an $8MM x 8 deal 4 years ago (79.5MM cap) at age 29 after putting up ~55-60pts/82GP.

8MM is the absolute floor for Miller, and at least 6 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,782
85,108
Vancouver, BC
Sure Miller has more assists. Goals are valued more highly for wingers though. But I can't disagree it's the best comp as comps go, since Zib just signed. There's more variability year over year so the most recent precedent is usually the best. Still think Zib > Miller.

Edit: I guess the fact that Miller also plays centre would increase his value IDK

Both Zibanejad and Miller play C.

And Couture signed an $8MM x 8 deal 4 years ago (79.5MM cap) at age 29 after putting up ~55-60pts/82GP.

8MM is the absolute floor for Miller, and at least 6 years.

Yup. That's the absolute floor, and it could be much higher than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timw33

Just A Bit Outside

Playoffs??!
Mar 6, 2010
16,653
15,681
As long as the team acquiring Miller is happy to pay him, could care less about AAV or term.

I want prospects and picks.

But I’m selfish that way.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,345
4,358
Ya, Zibanejad is a good comparison. I think he is slightly more valuable though due to the fact that he has scored more goals, has less perceived mental issues and his contract kicks in a year earlier than Millers despite the fact that they are basically the same age. So, using it as a precedent, I would expect a slightly lower amount for Miller, but I also recognize that Zibanejad may have taken a discount to play in New York as many players do.
 

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,166
1,536
vancouver
hopefully van finds another puckmover ala bowen byram. what the kid did in the playoffs is surprising to see. eating 21+mins 5 on 5. coming back from a concussion.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
23,562
37,376
Junktown
Tomas Hertl just got 8.137/8 at 28 years old and he averages 65/82GP over the last 3 seasons while also being a C.
 

Tomatoes11

Registered User
Dec 25, 2021
1,595
994
I am a huge fan of Zibanjed. Miller not so much. I think Zibanjed is way better but that said, miller is getting paid, even Boeser is to an extent. So trade them both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindgren

Reverend Mayhem

Lowly Serf/Reluctant Cuckold
Feb 15, 2009
28,291
5,408
Port Coquitlam, BC
hopefully van finds another puckmover ala bowen byram. what the kid did in the playoffs is surprising to see. eating 21+mins 5 on 5. coming back from a concussion.

Byram is an incredible player, he surprises me every time I watch him play. When he was 15 playing with the Giants, his skating was the best on the team. At 17, he was playing the half-wall as a defenseman in the WHL playoffs on the PP. And now this. You really feel good for the kid. That Colorado team is going to be trouble yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sting101

Hammer79

Registered User
Jan 9, 2009
7,391
1,250
Kelowna
I'm comfortable giving Miller 8 years at $8m AAV, as long as our management doesn't pull another Eriksson and load it with signing bonuses and NMC's to make it unmovable and buyout-proof. If he isn't performing, we do a buyout at the end. By then, the cap will be pushing towards $100m, as the player's escrow 'debt' will be paid and the cap will starting increasing normally. He's easily worth $10m in his prime, but we are buying subprime years to get his prime years at a discount.

We don't need to do a full tear-down rebuild anymore. We have elite players at least 1 per position, we have center depth. We need to fix special teams, bottom 6 (add toughness to help Schenn) and our RHD, but I don't see us being too far off anymore. If we trade Miller though, we are kicking the can down the road a couple of years and there is only so long that we can have EP on a team friendly deal. The chances of us picking a 100 point forward with picks we get back from a Miller trade are low.
 

Canucker

Go Hawks!
Oct 5, 2002
25,551
4,759
Oak Point, Texas
I'm comfortable giving Miller 8 years at $8m AAV, as long as our management doesn't pull another Eriksson and load it with signing bonuses and NMC's to make it unmovable and buyout-proof. If he isn't performing, we do a buyout at the end. By then, the cap will be pushing towards $100m, as the player's escrow 'debt' will be paid and the cap will starting increasing normally. He's easily worth $10m in his prime, but we are buying subprime years to get his prime years at a discount.

We don't need to do a full tear-down rebuild anymore. We have elite players at least 1 per position, we have center depth. We need to fix special teams, bottom 6 (add toughness to help Schenn) and our RHD, but I don't see us being too far off anymore. If we trade Miller though, we are kicking the can down the road a couple of years and there is only so long that we can have EP on a team friendly deal. The chances of us picking a 100 point forward with picks we get back from a Miller trade are low.
Personally, I wouldn't be a fan of going 8 years on Miller...I think he's due for a quick regression (just my opinion)...for me, I'm not really expecting to get a 100 point player out of a Miller deal, give me a combination of 3 quality picks/prospects who have the potential to upgrade the lineup and I'll be satisfied.

On a purely fantasy level, I'd be exploring trading both Miller and QH to NJ to see if they'd be willing to overpay to unite the Hughes brothers. Give me a #2 overall (draft Nemec), Hischier, Holtz, Bahl/Smith and a 2023 1st rounder if Miller re-signs, and you can have your brother combo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad