Mr. Canucklehead
Kitimat Canuck
With the off-season officially beginning, figured we could use a new thread.
He would need to be traded for, so maybe the Canes would want some of our signed depth back instead. If Poolman wasn't hurt he would be an obvious candidate as Carolina would get Term vs more upside. So I could see something if they think they can get something.
I think the rumour is that Bear isn't going to get a QO from Carolina. He's going to require a $2.5 million QO from a contending team where he's their 7th defender - I don't think there's any way they do that.
To me at that salary he's a negative value asset - no different than Poolman at the same salary.
If he's a UFA and you can sign him for $1.3 or something it's a different story.
I don’t hate the value of Höglander/Rathbone for Carlo/DeBrusk—but that would be a Benning-esque exchange of youth for help right now.Nils Hoglander
Jack Rathbone
Michael Ferland
Tucker Poolman
for
Brandon Carlo
Jake Debrusk
($6,891,667 plus Rathbone's RFA contract for $8,100,000)
Canucks gets some grit and goals up front and a long-term partner for Hughes or OEL signed for 5 years.
Bruins get some cap flexibility with Nils being able to be sent down to start the season while they juggle LTIR contracts, and Rathbone can help replace some of the LHD injuries to start the season.
Did he wink when he said the last part?
Maybe Johnson got a peek at what Millers agent is asking..If it’s outrageous the Canucks may not even bother to negotiate..?
While Miller's camp would definitely argue that the Zibanejad comp is market, I view it as an overpayment. Zib has had a 40 goal season and two 30 goal seasons. Miller is coming off a career year where he scored 32. His next best was 27 two years ago and 22 after that, 6 years ago. Last year Miller scored 15 goals. He definitely did well for himself having a career year but paying him for that expectation is a huge risk.It’s a pretty quick negotiation from the get go. “We want market value.” Which means he wants what Zibanejad got and all reports are the Canucks don’t want to do that price or term. Don’t even really need to actually exchange numbers.
While Miller's camp would definitely argue that the Zibanejad comp is market, I view it as an overpayment. Zib has had a 40 goal season and two 30 goal seasons. Miller is coming off a career year where he scored 32. His next best was 27 two years ago and 22 after that, 6 years ago. Last year Miller scored 15 goals. He definitely did well for himself having a career year but paying him for that expectation is a huge risk.
All that said, I wouldn't be surprised if Miller plays hardball. It makes no sense for him to take a discount. He's from the States and I'm sure would be quite happy to play in an american city with a lower tax bracket. .
Sure Miller has more assists. Goals are valued more highly for wingers though. But I can't disagree it's the best comp as comps go, since Zib just signed. There's more variability year over year so the most recent precedent is usually the best. Still think Zib > Miller.Over the last 3 seasons, Miller has averaged 88 points/82 GP and Zibanejad has averaged 87/82. They're about as close as you can get as comparables.
Over the last 3 seasons, Miller has averaged 88 points/82 GP and Zibanejad has averaged 87/82. They're about as close as you can get as comparables.
Sure Miller has more assists. Goals are valued more highly for wingers though. But I can't disagree it's the best comp as comps go, since Zib just signed. There's more variability year over year so the most recent precedent is usually the best. Still think Zib > Miller.
Edit: I guess the fact that Miller also plays centre would increase his value IDK
And Couture signed an $8MM x 8 deal 4 years ago (79.5MM cap) at age 29 after putting up ~55-60pts/82GP.
8MM is the absolute floor for Miller, and at least 6 years.
hopefully van finds another puckmover ala bowen byram. what the kid did in the playoffs is surprising to see. eating 21+mins 5 on 5. coming back from a concussion.
Personally, I wouldn't be a fan of going 8 years on Miller...I think he's due for a quick regression (just my opinion)...for me, I'm not really expecting to get a 100 point player out of a Miller deal, give me a combination of 3 quality picks/prospects who have the potential to upgrade the lineup and I'll be satisfied.I'm comfortable giving Miller 8 years at $8m AAV, as long as our management doesn't pull another Eriksson and load it with signing bonuses and NMC's to make it unmovable and buyout-proof. If he isn't performing, we do a buyout at the end. By then, the cap will be pushing towards $100m, as the player's escrow 'debt' will be paid and the cap will starting increasing normally. He's easily worth $10m in his prime, but we are buying subprime years to get his prime years at a discount.
We don't need to do a full tear-down rebuild anymore. We have elite players at least 1 per position, we have center depth. We need to fix special teams, bottom 6 (add toughness to help Schenn) and our RHD, but I don't see us being too far off anymore. If we trade Miller though, we are kicking the can down the road a couple of years and there is only so long that we can have EP on a team friendly deal. The chances of us picking a 100 point forward with picks we get back from a Miller trade are low.