1909
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2016
- 20,710
- 11,318
dahlin
.
.
zadina
svech
boqvist
.
tkatchuk
Walstrom
.
.
.
.
The rest.
Evan Bouchard would be a good one.
dahlin
.
.
zadina
svech
boqvist
.
tkatchuk
Walstrom
.
.
.
.
The rest.
dahlin
.
.
zadina
svech
boqvist
.
tkatchuk
Walstrom
.
.
.
.
The rest.
Nothing between, only Dahleen.Take a lien to get Dahlin
I would say:
Dahlin
.
Svechnikov
.
Zadina
Wahlstrom
Dobson
Boqvist
Tkachuk
Hughes
Bouchard
Wilde
Smith
.
the rest
Losing Plekanec might not hurt that much since Danault can pretty much do his job on a third line, it remains to see if Julien will keep Byron centering Patch or Danault will get his spot back.. Personally I prefer Byron to Danault to center the second line..The real tank will start once Plekanec and Pacioretty are traded.
Losing Plekanec will hurt us a lot defensively.
Losing Pacioretty will hurt us a lot offensively.
I see Zadina's game translate better to the NHL than Svech's (with schev having the better potential) game. Also Boqvist should be much higher than W and Dob
Svech lacks the IQ of a zadina like player imoThe only thing Svech really has to work on is his positionning in his own zone and that can be improved easily, he is by far the most skilled foward in that draft and his work ethic is pretty good as well.. Only area where Zadina might have an edge on Svechnikov is top end compete level and determination..
Svechnikov is an absolute beast. He is better than Zadina.Svech lacks the IQ of a zadina like player imo
She plays tennis though....Evan Bouchard would be a good one.
"Let' sacrifice a whole YEAR to increase our chance of landing a good player at the draft by 2-5% that may not even end up being better than the guy we would have drafted at the lower position".
Or - "make the playoffs with the best goalie in the world and hope we can do damage and win a few rounds"
Yeah. Option 2 by far.
Hmmm what you don't seem tp get is that the playoffs are not in reach and tge team is il-equipped for such a run.
We have 46 points in 48 games
Toronto has 57 points in 49 games.
1 game in hand - let's say we win. We're 9 points back with 35 games to go.
We play Toronto twice still this season. Let's say we win both games (they count for 4 points each). So we're now 5 points back with 30 games to go. If they lose 1 random game and we win 1 random game on a same day - we're now 3 points back with 29 games to go.
We're not out of reach of the playoffs yet. The 2nd wildcard is still within grasp too. Obviously it takes us stringing a few wins in a row, but it's definitely still possible.
Montreal has a 12% chance of making the playoffs.
"Let' sacrifice a whole YEAR to increase our chance of landing a good player at the draft by 2-5% that may not even end up being better than the guy we would have drafted at the lower position".
Or - "make the playoffs with the best goalie in the world and hope we can do damage and win a few rounds"
Yeah. Option 2 by far.
We have 46 points in 48 games
Toronto has 57 points in 49 games.
1 game in hand - let's say we win. We're 9 points back with 35 games to go.
We play Toronto twice still this season. Let's say we win both games (they count for 4 points each). So we're now 5 points back with 30 games to go. If they lose 1 random game and we win 1 random game on a same day - we're now 3 points back with 29 games to go.
We're not out of reach of the playoffs yet. The 2nd wildcard is still within grasp too. Obviously it takes us stringing a few wins in a row, but it's definitely still possible.