I thought Caufield looked like he was pressing a little too much in this game, as if the pressure of being within striking distance of Ovechkin's tournament scoring record was getting to him. He missed on a few excellent setups from Hughes and Zegras that you would normally expect him to bury, and that penalty shot attempt was ugly.I don't agree. He put one puck in the net, but besides that, had his worst game of the tournament. Zegras and Hughes were great. Caufield was nowhere near as good as either of those two today.
So, Hawks need another Debrincat?Hawks do not need another high scoring d-man. Already have Gustafsson (60+ point guy),top D (elite) prospects: Jokiharju,Boqvist,Beaudin and other quality D prospects like Mitchell and Krys, then there's these d-men already with long contracts, DKeith,BSeabrook,CMurphy
- then there's Koekkoek and Dahlström
When a player like Cole Caufield falls in to your lap, you gotta pick him. Hawks need a player like Caufield,
don't need to draft yet another d-man, no needs for becoming the next Anaheim Ducks.
So, Hawks need another Debrincat?
Nice achievement. Why didn't you post it into the Caufield thread though?
Will he beat Kucherov's 21 points in 7 games, though? Him or Hughes.
Will he beat Kucherov's 21 points in 7 games, though? Him or Hughes.
Ovechkin scored his record two years younger though, the Americans sending a team full of this summer's top draft picks to U18 is pretty unique.
Ovechkin scored his record two years younger though, the Americans sending a team full of this summer's top draft picks to U18 is pretty unique.
He's definitely not going to go 3rd. First half of the first round probably.