Caser
@RUSProspects
Is that typical for KHL teams to do?
Neftekhimik's coach is Andrei Nazarov, he is quite emotional and Shafigullin didn't play too well when they gave up the decisive goal in the game one.
Is that typical for KHL teams to do?
Neftekhimik's coach is Andrei Nazarov, he is quite emotional and Shafigullin didn't play too well when they gave up the decisive goal in the game one.
Is that why his ice time is around 11 minutes and 8 minutes in games 2 and 3?
How is he doing in Russia? Obviously not putting up points - is he playing poorly as well?
His ice time is very limited, 6:22 per game.
Can a frequent Russian watcher shine light on why Bulat was given the 'A'? He is the youngest player on the team and pointless in 22 games. A great talent, but wouldn't really have expected that.
First two points this season for Bulat, and vs CSKA.
Extended his contract with Neftekhimik for 2 more seasons.
Hopefully he gets more playing time, whether it's the KHL or MHL. Averaging less than 7 minutes per game is a waste of a year.
Which one?Holy smokes.
Guy needs a different development path though.
Which one?
LOL No. Dergachyov was never that good to begin with. Just overhyped in NA for no reason. I mean, he was a junior NT 4th liner. Those are no guaranteed pros most of the time. Same thing with Shafigullin. He is in the perfect spot for his development. With a rather bad team that can't afford to sit youngsters if they are any good. If he is right now not good enough he has nobody to blame but himself. That is not to say he can't turn it around. He is not a prospect of a sure shot caliber. Those can take years to finally mold into something.Honestly I don't care as long as he gets minutes.
Same thing happened to Dergachyov, spent 3-4 years getting 6-7 minutes a game and now he's hardly on the radar. If the KHL experience is going to be the same Bulat, he'd be better served in a different league.
LOL No. Dergachyov was never that good to begin with. Just overhyped in NA for no reason. I mean, he was a junior NT 4th liner. Those are no guaranteed pros most of the time. Same thing with Shafigullin. He is in the perfect spot for his development. With a rather bad team that can't afford to sit youngsters if they are any good. If he is right now not good enough he has nobody to blame but himself. That is not to say he can't turn it around. He is not a prospect of a sure shot caliber. Those can take years to finally mold into something.
LOL No. Dergachyov was never that good to begin with. Just overhyped in NA for no reason. I mean, he was a junior NT 4th liner. Those are no guaranteed pros most of the time. Same thing with Shafigullin. He is in the perfect spot for his development. With a rather bad team that can't afford to sit youngsters if they are any good. If he is right now not good enough he has nobody to blame but himself. That is not to say he can't turn it around. He is not a prospect of a sure shot caliber. Those can take years to finally mold into something.
Well, you obviously even haven't heard of the VHL. BTW the ice time obsession is just another hype. Ice time does not equal quality of development.To develop, prospects need ice time regardless of their skill level. Players don't develop well playing less than 10 mins per game on the 4th line. If he's not good enough for the KHL, he should play in the MHL or another league where he will get the ice time he needs to develop.
Let's begin with a simple statement. They were 3rd rounders, which seemes alright for both of them. How often do 3rd rounders become NHLers? Obviously the Kings would be thrilled if both of them developed into NHL material players, but let's be realistic.Neither guy is guaranteed and I never said either were.
But even stars won't develop sitting on the 4th line/bench of teams, good or bad.
Will never understand this masochistic "Well, you should have just been better" thing, as if one can develop on their own while stuck in hockey purgatory. KHL isn't a developmental league, I get that, and that's exactly my point. Rotting on the bench does nothing for anyone, and sitting there until they're in their prime before becoming a random KHL 3rd-liner so you can say "see I told you so" is exactly why I'm suggesting it's better to be playing elsewhere. I mean, in Dergachyov's case, playing for SKA behind all sorts of allstar vets is a stupidass development situation from an ice time perspective. Yes, it's cool to absorb hockey knowledge from Gusev, Datsyuk, et. al., but playing 5 minutes a game...he may as well be working the white board.
If they have no intention of playing in the NHL, cool. Stay at home and play deep in the KHL, no hard feelings. But from a Kings perspective, it's absolutely garbage to have them just rotting there.