Nope. The only way I'd move that 1st is for a younger player like Schenn or Stone.
Never heard of the guy until now. He will always be Manglepie to me from now on.How the hell do you pronounce that dude's last name?
MAN-gee-AH-pah-neeHow the hell do you pronounce that dude's last name?
Mangiapane sure makes me say meh, idk about the rest of you
He's amazing in the AHL and hasn't done anything in the NHL
whats the difference, either way they are a rental? it only matters how they play right now
Schenn is younger and has another year on his contract. Staal is a pure rental.
Schenn is younger and has another year on his contract. Staal is a pure rental.
We just need a rental....we have Tkachuk, Bennett and the defense to pay next year and forward....dont need another big contract
stone isnt
Stone's also an absurd NHLer that'd make Calgary one of the most loaded teams of the cap era.
yeah but his age isnt really relevant is what i meant
I tried rereading your post a few times to see how I could make an age connection... in terms of what you responded to. I think we got our lines crossed here, because it looks like you were saying Stone's also a rental, versus Stone's age doesn't matter.
Treliving shouldn't make any deals for rentals unless they're depth players that wouldn't mess with the chemistry of the team